Happy holiday Soc!
Formaer spouse demanded the following language be included in one of the many revisions to the original JOD. Current Language states..." all abatements will be paid to the trust account of Defendants (that is me) Attourney XXX XXX XXX .... "
Since that order was entered I have gone pro per. My former attorney stipulated that he would continue to accept the checks and send payment to me once the check cleared.
Twice in the last three weeks, former spouse has deposited money directly into my bank account and sent me an e-mail with the details of said transaction. Unbeliveably, she has included my account number and banking institution in the un-encripted communication.
After the first occurance, I told former spouse and her attorney that this was unacceptable and must stop. Since it has occurred again, obviousely she has not stopped.
Jurisdiction is Michigan
Question
1) What can you suggest?
Formaer spouse demanded the following language be included in one of the many revisions to the original JOD. Current Language states..." all abatements will be paid to the trust account of Defendants (that is me) Attourney XXX XXX XXX .... "
Since that order was entered I have gone pro per. My former attorney stipulated that he would continue to accept the checks and send payment to me once the check cleared.
Twice in the last three weeks, former spouse has deposited money directly into my bank account and sent me an e-mail with the details of said transaction. Unbeliveably, she has included my account number and banking institution in the un-encripted communication.
After the first occurance, I told former spouse and her attorney that this was unacceptable and must stop. Since it has occurred again, obviousely she has not stopped.
Jurisdiction is Michigan
Question
1) What can you suggest?