Mr. soc.....
the case in NJ was closed as of 5-31-06 by the state of NJ. Thus resulting in zero monies owed to any parent.
the only way the case was re-opened was the ruling of the judge dated 9-18-06. The ncp's paycheck reflects such differences.
So, mr. Soc, the case was closed, resulting in zero monies owed. Any outstanding arrerages were paid. thus, resulting in zero arrearages. Once, the case was magically reopened by the state of the inept nj nothing was owed as any arrearages.
So, from May 31 to Sept. 18th any garnishment illegally taken from Mr. Jola was returned as such.
Don't you find it utterly sickening that the only thing I ever come here to fight about the CS is against the lovely state of NJ? Geez.....
so, now that I have argued our point what shall we say to the snot ass that hung up on Mr. Jola the other day from the state of NJ? literally hung up on him.
the case in NJ was closed as of 5-31-06 by the state of NJ. Thus resulting in zero monies owed to any parent.
the only way the case was re-opened was the ruling of the judge dated 9-18-06. The ncp's paycheck reflects such differences.
So, mr. Soc, the case was closed, resulting in zero monies owed. Any outstanding arrerages were paid. thus, resulting in zero arrearages. Once, the case was magically reopened by the state of the inept nj nothing was owed as any arrearages.
So, from May 31 to Sept. 18th any garnishment illegally taken from Mr. Jola was returned as such.
Don't you find it utterly sickening that the only thing I ever come here to fight about the CS is against the lovely state of NJ? Geez.....
so, now that I have argued our point what shall we say to the snot ass that hung up on Mr. Jola the other day from the state of NJ? literally hung up on him.