>>>You are the one who sounds spiteful!
>>>Were you witness to the birth? If so... What would make you think this was done "behind my back"?? How much support did you provide the mother for the 6 or so months that you were aware she was carrying your child?
If you had taken the time to research my topic threads before posting a reply to my questions, you would know the answers to most of those questions. I find it very insulting that you would assume the worst and make such an accusation.
I'm not bashing the mom, believe me if i were it would be a much "worse smelling" post, because there certainly is plenty of choices she has made that would facilitate just that.
>>>If you have indeed been granted physical and primary custody of this child, why would you need to travel to Richmond, VA to prove your point?
Richmond is where all vital records are kept in VA. I went there to secure a birth certificate so my daughter and I could travel (via air) to see her grandmother, great grandmother and relatives back in my home town. I shouldn't have to explain this, but you seem particularly ignorant, so I'll just inform you that it makes boarding and flying with a minor (especially under age 2) much easier with proof of age. Not to mention that I needed a birth certificate anyway.
>>>Were you witness to the birth? If so... What would make you think this was done "behind my back"?? How much support did you provide the mother for the 6 or so months that you were aware she was carrying your child?
I have been supportive the whole time, paid child support the whole time - which by the way, I opened the child support case, not the BM. It should be sufficient to say that I know the BM - and you don't. Again, your assumptions hint at your level of intelligence, and if not then certainly your jaded sense of fairness.
>>>My basis is based on the fact that unless a married couple agrees on a name as a couple...
Yeah. That would have been great - except that (as I've explained in many a post that you didn't care to research before speaking your mind) the BM is manipulative, not trustworthy, and as is her nature is not one to cooperate very much.
By the way, you're wrong about the mother "holding all the cards" - as a BF I have every right to the physical and legal responsibilities of my daughter as does her mother! Married or not!
So you know what you can do with your post, your opinions and your "well wishes"?
durandal
>>>Were you witness to the birth? If so... What would make you think this was done "behind my back"?? How much support did you provide the mother for the 6 or so months that you were aware she was carrying your child?
If you had taken the time to research my topic threads before posting a reply to my questions, you would know the answers to most of those questions. I find it very insulting that you would assume the worst and make such an accusation.
I'm not bashing the mom, believe me if i were it would be a much "worse smelling" post, because there certainly is plenty of choices she has made that would facilitate just that.
>>>If you have indeed been granted physical and primary custody of this child, why would you need to travel to Richmond, VA to prove your point?
Richmond is where all vital records are kept in VA. I went there to secure a birth certificate so my daughter and I could travel (via air) to see her grandmother, great grandmother and relatives back in my home town. I shouldn't have to explain this, but you seem particularly ignorant, so I'll just inform you that it makes boarding and flying with a minor (especially under age 2) much easier with proof of age. Not to mention that I needed a birth certificate anyway.
>>>Were you witness to the birth? If so... What would make you think this was done "behind my back"?? How much support did you provide the mother for the 6 or so months that you were aware she was carrying your child?
I have been supportive the whole time, paid child support the whole time - which by the way, I opened the child support case, not the BM. It should be sufficient to say that I know the BM - and you don't. Again, your assumptions hint at your level of intelligence, and if not then certainly your jaded sense of fairness.
>>>My basis is based on the fact that unless a married couple agrees on a name as a couple...
Yeah. That would have been great - except that (as I've explained in many a post that you didn't care to research before speaking your mind) the BM is manipulative, not trustworthy, and as is her nature is not one to cooperate very much.
By the way, you're wrong about the mother "holding all the cards" - as a BF I have every right to the physical and legal responsibilities of my daughter as does her mother! Married or not!
So you know what you can do with your post, your opinions and your "well wishes"?
durandal