Quote from: Davy on Jun 01, 2009, 06:43:20 PM
It is so clear that you no nothing .. absolutely nothing. What on earth was the left-behind parent suppose to file.
What made-up defining moment or event do you have , other than your illogical general statements to indicate father approval of the move or secure jurisdiction over the father or any such fact....not conjecture. You just don't make a lick of sense and what you say is NOT the way it works.
So I know nothing? Because you say so? Sorry, after reading several of your posts, it is clear that your attempted insult fell far short. And it is equally clear that you really don't know much about what you are talking about.
It's called a RESTRAINING ORDER. What would be in the restraining order, you might wonder? Well, what it would say is that the mother has to bring the children back to the original state and that she would be prevented from moving the children out of state again while the matter of custody and parenting time is settled.
Of course, too much time has passed for the father to be able to do this. It's called implied consent. That is how a judge MAY view his inaction. And when it comes to light that he actually moved there to try to work things out, it's going to be more than implied consent. It's going to be implicit consent.