Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Topics - Bolivar

#31
Dr. Phil - Fighting to get your kids back?

Fighting To Get Your Kids Back?

The Dr. Phil show is looking for a parent who had their child taken away by an ex-spouse or a family member.

Did you struggle in a court battle that ended with you losing your children?

Do you want to ask your ex-spouse to let you have visitation with your children?

Has your ex-spouse moved out of state and you are no longer able to see your kids?

If you want to get your kids back from a family member or ex-spouse, you want some help from Dr. Phil and YOU ARE WILLING TO APPEAR ON THE SHOW, email us your story.

https://www.drphil.com/drphilplugger/templates/BeOnTheShow.jhtml?action=respond&plugId=D156700007
#32
Father's Issues / Things Feminists Say About Men
Mar 10, 2005, 10:23:52 AM
*why antifeminism is needed? *

 HERE,S WHY


 */'My feelings about men are the result of my experience. I have little  sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the  handsome young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in his stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don't even need to shrug. I simply don't care. What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply don't matter."
/ Marilyn French; The Woman's Room.*


 */"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of  violence perpetrated against a woman."
/ Catherine MacKinnon*


 */"To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking  dildo."
/ Valerie Solanas*


 */"I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig."
/ Andrea Dworkin*


 */"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act,  that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that  is oppressing them."
/ Robin Morgan*


 "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at  approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in
 /The  Future - If There Is One - Is Female/.


 "If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary  process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of  males."
 --Mary Daly
 former Professor at Boston College, 2001
 http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/r/roberts/03/roberts081203.htm
#33
This was emailed to me from PEP - check out the link.  I think you will like it the Bumper Stickers. :-)

Bolivar

============================

I love the "Hey Attorney General Gregg Abbott, My name is Daddy not
Respondent"

 but when I read it, thought of some other variables.

 How about "I'm a Parent, not the Payee"  Or  " I'm a Parent, not an NCP" .

I was literally addressed by the child support office as the Payee. That is why I thought of that one..it was just insulting. I didn't even get the respect of
Paying Parent or any other variable.

 

Panhandle Regional Affiliates of ACFC

Charles P. Hussey III

Executive Director

[email protected]

============================

From: James OConnor [mailto:[email protected]]

These are photo-proofs of the bumper stickers we're getting ready to offer
at the PEP website (still a couple of spelling corrections to be made).

They provide a variety of ways (and intensities) for expressing the thoughts
and feelings that people have about our issue.  Everyone is likely to have
some they like and some they don't like.  That's to be expected.  

 

Before we go final with this, we'd like to hear any comments you might have.

 

http://www.thebumpersticker.com/clients/pep/pep.htm


Please send comments to [email protected].

Thanks,

Jim
James OConnor [mailto:[email protected]]



People for Equal Parenting (PEP) A Call for Common Sense
http://www.pepintexas.org/
#34
Father's Issues / Love of my Life
Feb 11, 2005, 10:36:25 AM

The love of my life.

(yea I'm showing off) :-)


[IMG SRC="http://www.geocities.com/cantonoh2003/son_01.jpg" BORDER=0]
#35
Father's Issues / Father wants his child back!!!
Jan 19, 2005, 12:10:42 PM
Father wants his child back!!!

Threatens to blow up van near the White House if his child is not given back.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/bush_security_van_dc


----HACKal Message-----
From: ANCPR [mailto:noreply@a...]


Hello,

I hope that you have got word about the father who threatened to blow
up his van in front of the White House because of the situation with
respect to the custody of his child. See http://ancpr.com/blogs
(http://ancpr.com/blogs) We sent this story out on the previous
newsletter.

Here's what must be done immediately, while this story is still in
the news:


1. Go to http://ancpr.com/staterepresentatives.htm
(http://ancpr.com/staterepresentatives.htm) now and get the phone
numbers for all your representatives.

2. As soon as their offices open, CALL THEM ON THE PHONE. Don't
email. Call them. You won't be able to talk with your representative
directly, but you will be able to talk to one of their legislative
aides. These people are on your payroll. It's their job to listen to
you and what is on your mind.

3. Tell these people that you sympathize with the man who took this
desparate action in the nation's capitol. Tell them that you want
them to know that you understand exactly what this man is going
through and that you have had a similar experience.

Under no circumstances be apologetic and weak. Don't say, "of course, I don't support what he did." Of course you don't support blowing up yourself in front of the Capitol. However, you don't need to say that.

Be strong. Be assertive. Just say, I understand, and I support him in
his fight to get attention to the injustice that is destroying so
many families, fathers, mothers, their children, in family courts
across the nation. Tell them in no uncertain terms that this isn't a
local problem, it's national, and it will need to be addressed on a
national basis. Be really forceful on this issue.


[font size=+2]I have a little thing to ask of each of you. Give some thought to this:

Let's say that a court took your car away from you and gave that car to someone else. Then the court made you pay the car payment, the insurance, the gasoline and general maintenance costs of the car. What would you do? I submit you'd all, each and every one of you, be out in the streets rioting. Many of you would quite possibly shoot the judge who made the order! Yet, let them take your children, and then make you pay money to the very person who destroyed your family, and what do you do? If you are like most, you just hide in a hole like Saddam Hussein.[/font]



If it's true that we get the kind of government that we deserve, then
that is a very sad statement about fathers in America.

Give this some thought,

Lowell Jaks, ANCPR
#36
Father's Issues / Two very good articles
Jan 18, 2005, 11:13:07 AM
Two very good articles


1. media gender bias: the beginning of the end?

Read this press release/article describing a group of citizens taking action to document and change media gender bias. Perhaps you can help.


RADAR is Scanning for Media Bias Against Men and Fathers
http://www.mensnewsdaily.com/archive/newswire/news2005/0105/011505-radar-launch.htm



2. more VAWA information

Some more background on VAWA, by this excellent author found here:

Domestic Violence Law Fuels Big Government
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,144073,00.html


#37
Father's Issues / URGENT INTERVENTION REQUESTED
Jan 13, 2005, 01:41:44 PM
This was emailed to ROBERT G. LASHEFF and he has forward this message asking for help.


-------------------------------------


RECIEVED THIS TODAY PLEASE INTERVENE WHEN AND WHERE POSSIBLE!!

PLEASE send Bruce Golden a message of hope.

Thanks


----HACKal Message-----

Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:14:49 -0800 (PST)
From:  "bruce golden"  
Subject: Re: [ILLINOISFAMILYADVOCACY] IMPORTANT ILLINOIS CLASS ACTION
1/11/05
To: "ROBERT G. LASHEFF"

   
Pleae take me off your list. I have been destroyed and am going to jump.
#38
Father's Issues / Husband For Sale
Jan 13, 2005, 10:57:38 AM
Husband For Sale

A store that sells husbands has just opened in Dallas, TX where a woman may go to choose a husband from among many men. The store is comprised of 6 floors, and the men increase in positive attributes as the shopper ascends the flights.

There is however, a catch. As you open the door to any floor you may choose a man from that floor, but if you go up a floor, you cannot go back down except to exit the building.

So a woman goes to the shopping center to find a husband.


On the first floor the sign on the door reads:

Floor 1 - These men have jobs.

The woman reads the sign and says to herself, "Well, that's better than my last boyfriend, but I wonder what's further up?" So up she goes.


The second floor sign reads:

Floor 2 - These men have jobs and love, kids.

The woman remarks to herself, "That's great, but I wonder what's further up?" And up she! goes again.


The third floor sign reads:

Floor 3 - These men have jobs, love kids and are extremely good looking.

"Hmmm, better" she says. "But I wonder what's upstairs?"


The fourth floor sign reads:

Floor 4 - These men have jobs, love kids, are extremely good looking and help with the housework.

"Wow!" exclaims the woman, "very tempting. BUT, there must be more further up!" And again she heads up another flight.


The fifth floor sign reads:

Floor 5 - These men have jobs, love kids, are extremely good looking, help with the housework and have a strong romantic streak. "Oh, mercy me! But just think... what must be awaiting me further on?" So up to the sixth floor she goes.


The sixth floor sign reads:

Floor 6 - You are visitor 3,456,789,012 to this floor. There are no men on this floor. This floor exists solely as proof that women are impossible to please.

Thank you for shopping at Husband Mart and have a nice day!
#39
Father's Issues / Another Rick Badie Column
Jan 07, 2005, 05:55:55 AM
To bring attention to the Child Support problem please take 5 minutes and send an email.  The more publicity we get the better off our children will be.  Heck just a one liner email is better than nothing. :-)

Thanks,
Bolivar

====================================


Another Rick Badie Column


Rick has written several articles on subjects that support fathers and families.

YOUR responses determine the AJC's coverage on such subjects!
It is especially important to address the issues of child support and custody now that the legislative session in starting and the AJC will be sensing what its readers are interested in reading about.

Take a few moments to email a response to Rick so the AJC will know these types of articles are a subject of concern to their readers!
 
Be sure to thank Rick and give him your comments.
email him at [email protected]
 
Also, If you can help Tim find a job, email him by Clicking Here
or email him at [email protected]
Tim is experienced in the Information Technology field.
 
-------------------------------------------------------------


Noncustodial dad faces bottom line

By RICK BADIE
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 01/06/05

On Oct. 21, Timothy E. Meek was ordered to pay $500 a month in child support for his two daughters.

That same day, he was sentenced to 90 days in the Gwinnett County Detention Center for violating the conditions of his work-release program.
   

Pretty hard to hold down a job if you're locked up. Yet that was Meek's predicament the last two months of 2004, and the new year hasn't been much of an improvement.

"I need to find work — fast" said Meek, 47. "I'm scared to death."

Last summer, I wrote about Meek in a column on how noncustodial parents often get the shaft when it comes to child support. He or she typically pays the bulk of it, regardless of the custodial parent's earnings. The support amount is based on gross income — before taxes — with no consideration given for payroll deductions like health insurance.

And God help them if they have a second family or worse, lose their jobs. They must wait six months before they can petition the courts for a payment modification. Meanwhile, the unpaid support continues to accrue, which is part to blame for Meek's situation.

These are some of the issues a proposed bill would address in this year's General Assembly that convenes Monday. The legislation would change state rules that judges follow to set child support terms.

One supporter for change is Rep. Earl Ehrhart, a Republican from Powder Springs who likely will be chairman of the House Rules Committee. In past sessions, the divorced father of two has sponsored legislation to rework the state laws that govern child support allocations. He says current laws impoverish the noncustodial parent, especially if that person remarries.

Meek didn't remarry after his divorce in February 1997. But four years ago, when he lost a $72,000 job with BellSouth, he bottomed out. Today, life for Meek is no better than it was when I wrote about him in August.

Back then, he was in arrears to the tune of about $45,000. He was on a court-ordered work-release program, which allowed him to work at a Snellville Wal-Mart. He sold shotguns. But he says he lost that job because his nightly curfew prevented him from working a later shift, which his employer desired at one point.

The courts didn't learn of Meeks jobless state until the scheduled hearing on Oct. 21. That led to the 90-day jail sentence for "lying about having employment," court records show.

It's bad enough that Meek was ever incarcerated in the first place. At least his original punishment allowed him to begin making good on his debt. But to order him to pay child support, then toss him in jail with no conditions that allow him to seek or hold employment, is ludicrous.

And common.

"Many of these rulings where fathers are incarcerated for not paying child support are very punitive, and in Tim's case it's being taken to the nth degree," said Karen J. Wagner, a child advocate in Marietta.

"The laws work against families, and it's completely unfair."

On Dec. 2, Meek returned to Gwinnett County Superior Court for yet another hearing. The presiding judge seemed to get it. In order for Meek to pay child support, he had to work. In order to work, Meek couldn't remain jailed.

The judge ordered Meek back on work-release. He must find find a job, and he's looking — for anything.

"The bottom line is I need some money," Meek said. "And I need a lot of it."

• Rick Badie's column appears on Sundays, Tuesdays and Thursdays. He can be reached by e-mail at [email protected]

 
#40
Father's Issues / FIRM site has been Disabled
Jan 05, 2005, 01:01:27 PM
LOL - Hold back your tears. HA HA HO HA hahahahahaha

Eric Ericson's website FIRM is no more because of so many complaints.

http://groups.msn.com/FathersIntegrityRightsMovementFIRM


Hot from the Press!

This Group is Unavailable

This group has been disabled for administrative purposes.
#41
Father's Issues / www.BADJUDGE.net
Jan 04, 2005, 09:14:56 AM
PLEASE CIRCULATE WIDELY & FREELY NEAR, FAR, WHERE APPROPRIATE


creation of
BADJUDGE.net        1 866 BADJUDGE.com

MISSION STATEMENT: to create a public awareness. Formulation of nationwide data base, a clearing house, information central registry identifying by state, characteristic NAME & PICTURE OF ALL BAD JUDGES. This information to be presented on website, be acquired thru either first hand bad personal experience held with judge or knowledge obtained thru eye witness accounting first hand observation, or readily obtained available publicly common and open specifically as relates pertaining to BAD JUDGES and their BAD DECISIONS being reached.  

Its high time BAD JUDGES once and for all personally and financially be held responsible/accountable for their making long term standing bad lousy decisions being reached, all the while knowing they can continue to do so by their getting away with such type kind of outrageous behavior/decisions simply because they can, never fearing consequence of legal or personal reprisal.

DESPITE WHAT JUDGES MAY COME TO THINK, JUDGES ARE NOT GODS NOR EVER ABOVE THE LAW !!!!!!

OBJECTIVE
Within next several few weeks I will be formulating, creating and making operational, what is hoped for soon to be published it being made active, a new website

          www. BAD JUDGE.net,  &  //www.1 866 BADJUDGE.com.

I am particularly interested in hearing learning from all those voiced concerns held shared by many of you previously before by NCPs and divorced(ing) parents specifically as it relates to what you might best otherwise entertain, best want to see incorporated, come to know by having it including within this web site; specifically as it relates to formally identifying, fingering, shaming, embarrassing, naming, pointing to, photographic depictions bringing into focus much needed attention made  best known to exist for viewing by publics scrutinizing eyes.  

Information must include ALL JUDGE'S fuller identities with picture photographs included, and brief statement of fact as to all existing BADJUDGES judges decisions having bben reached.  

Consequentially BADJUDGES for which in turn they themselves never are held personally accountable, nor responsible, nor financially liable; being they literally legally get away with committing just shy of murder and treason, yet which formally  exists no compelling organized vested interest group legally empowerd or ordained composed of civilian review board for badjudge oversight and judge termination.  

IT'S HIGH TIME ALL JUDGES BE HELD, PERSONALLY ACCOUNTABLE and FINANCIALLY LIABLE FOR ALL THEIR ACTIONS AND DECISIONS reached OCCURRING IN LINE OF JOB DUTY FUNCTION. IF A SITTING JUDGE EVER FAILS TO EITHER PERFORM THEIR JOB DUTIES OR IN ALTERNATIVE DOES LOUSY INADEQUATE JOB BY PERFORMING THEM, THEN FIRE EM IMMEDIATELY WITHOUT NEED FOR LENGTHY PROTRACTED EXPENSIVE TIME CONSUMING LITIGATION NOW NECESSARY REQUIRED FOR THEIR RECUSAL AND/OR IMPEACHMENT. (STREAMLINE THE PROCESS!!!!!)

When was last time you ever heard of any judges terminating themselves from their cushy well paid tenured jobs due to conflict of interest shared or biases held, or due to their lack of impartiality by their failure to remain neutral, unbiased unfair during a trial?

TIE ALL JUDGES SALARIES, BENEFITS AND TENURE DIRECTLY TO THEIR JOB PERFORMANCE SUCCESS RATES AS SKILL RELATES TO THEIR DECISIONS REACHED, FIRST BY HAVING JUDGES CONTINUALLY BEING EVALUATED SCORED AS TO THEIR JOB LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE. JUDGE EVALUATIONS BEING COMPRISED OF A CIVILIAN JUDICIAL REVIEW BOARD OVERSIGHT. (THE CITIZEN JURY).

AS DONALD TRUMP COINED THE EVER INCREASING POPULAR PHRASE, SO MANY OFT TIMES NOW REPEATED, "[JUDGE) YOUR FIRED!".


I LOOK TOWARD YOUR SUPPORT WITHIN THIS ENDEAVOR ALONG WITH YOUR INPUT AND FEED BACK.

THANK YOU

STEVE GREENSPAN
[email protected]
678 687 7100
516 852 1644
#42
Father's Issues / bigsigh you are such a fake!!!!
Jan 01, 2005, 02:42:51 PM
Bigsigh sounds like you spend A LOT of time with woman shelters and Choose NOT to spend A LOT of time with your own daughter.  In your own words you could NOT raise your daughter.

Bigsigh you are such a fake.  Give it a rest and join Eric of the FIRM or go back to NOW.

You can tell your fellow woman at NOW that NO father, and I mean NO father, on this board is a poor nurturer.  We are all capable and ready to raise our children, if given the chance by the courts.  We are real Fathers trying to be more than just a visitor in our children's life.  We are committed to sharing equal time with our child 50/50 physical and legal custody.

You say you gave you daughter back to the mom because you could not handel her, BUT you volunteer at woman's shelters – YOU ARE A FAKE and a TROLL!!!!!

MY SON IS NUMBER ONE IMPORTANCE IN MY LIFE.  He is my everything.  Yes, I am engaged and my fiancee knows how committed I am as a father.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bigsigh said:

[em]Before you start trashing the DV help system, I suggest you get involved and see the reality of it. There aren't many "exclusive" men's DV shelters because there aren't people donating to get them. You can't blame women for that.

This all coming from a man... [/em]

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Back in September bigsigh said:

[em]"When it came to custody, my new wife fully expected my ex wife to get custody & me visitation. She pretty much stayed out of the proceedings and when I came home telling her my 4 year old daughter would be coming to live with us full time she wasn't happy to say the least. Her exact words were "how the hell did that happen?".

".......... I fought for my daughter fully expecting my new wife to take on the step-mom role. She is a mom already, I thought maternal instincts were maternal instincts, no matter who the kid was. ........."[/em]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

bigsigh said just recently

[em]"..........She (daughter) is with her mom and everything is how it should be." [/em]

------------------------------------------------------------------------

If that last statement doesn't sound like a NOW advocate I don't know what does.

#43
Father's Issues / mother kills teens then self
Dec 30, 2004, 07:28:37 AM
http://www.wakeweekly.com/story2.shtml

The Wake Weekly
 PO Box 1919 - 229 E. Owen Ave.
Wake Forest, NC 27588


Franklin County mother kills teens, self

by Lindsay Varner, Wake Weekly Staff Writer


December 30, 2004

A Franklin County woman shot and killed her two teenage children and herself early Wednesday morning in a mobile home off Flat Rock Church Road.

Caroline Ollison, 36, of 33 Whites Lane, Louisburg, was found dead by her roommate, Tammy Jackson, around 3 a.m., Franklin County Sheriff Jerry Jones said.

Jones said the apparent cause of death was a self-inflicted gunshot wound to the head. After EMS and a deputy arrived at the scene, a deputy went through the doublewide to check on Ollison's children. Jones said the deputy found Nicole Ollison, 14, dead in the living room.

"She was shot point blank in the head while she was sleeping," Jones said.

The deputy then found Reginald "R.J." Ollison, 13, shot to death in a bedroom. R.J. was also shot in the head and neck while sleeping, Jones said.

He said investigators believe Ollison shot her daughter first, then traveled to her son's bedroom to shoot him before returning to the bedroom she shared with Jackson and turning the rifle on herself. The noise awakened Jackson who called authorities.

Jones said the children lived with their father, Reginald Ollison, in the Durham area. Reginald Ollison was separated from his wife, who had only recently been granted permission for the children to visit her during the holidays.

Ollison had lived in the county for two or three months, Jones said. He said the children had only been at the mobile home for a few days.

Investigators have not established a motive. Jackson and her 12-year-old son were unharmed.



Last Updated On: December 30, 2004
#44

http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/Columnists/Winnipeg/Lydia_Lovric/2004/12/27/79 8107.html

Mon, December 27, 2004

It's all about revenge, not equality

By Lydia Lovric

One of the biggest lies perpetuated by modern-day feminists is the
contention that feminism is about equality. Feminists aren't interested in
equality. What they want is revenge.

Apparently, breaking down barriers and smashing glass ceilings is laudable
only when women are the beneficiaries. Equality is not a two-way street for
these feminists. It's more of a one-way street with a dead end. That's why
the movement is going nowhere in the eyes of many young women, including myself.

Recently, a group of women decided to file a complaint with the B.C. Human
Rights Tribunal. They weren't too happy about the fact that an exclusive
Vancouver golf club boasts a male-only lounge. They said it was sexist. And
they're right. But that doesn't mean that this lounge should be forced to
accept female members.

Equality is not about getting ovaries into any and every boys' club. Women
in this country have the right to form their own clubs (whether it be co-ed
or just for ladies) and that's what equality is about. The law should only
provide opportunity. It's up to the individual to do the rest.

So if women in Vancouver want a posh place to eat meals and chat about golf, then they have every right to create their own establishment. They also have the option to bar men or admit them. And while feminists want the right to barge into all-male establishments, it seems that what's good for the goose is not so good for the gander.

When Ralph Gordon Stopps tried to take advantage of a free 10-day membership at a local gym club, he was denied entry. The basis for this rejection? Genitalia. It appears that Mr. Stopps has the wrong "parts" to become a member of "Just Ladies Fitness."

Where are the feminists now? Why aren't they standing up for Mr. Stopps and the outrageous discrimination he has faced based purely on sex? Why is it OK to have fitness clubs for women only, but a group of male golf buddies can't sit around and talk about how Tiger Woods' game has gone downhill ever since he tied the knot?

The truth is, feminists will never defend someone like Mr. Stopps. Feminists
want to eat their cake while the men in the world dine on Timbits.

Don't believe me? Brigitte LeBlanc, a 14-year-old Moncton girl, wasn't
satisfied playing hockey with the boys. She wanted more. So she petitioned
the New Brunswick Human Rights Commission to grant her the right to use the boys' locker room. Astonishingly, she won.

Surely, there are a few 14-year-old boys out there who wouldn't mind gaining entry to the girls' locker room. But you can bet that day will never come. We have a greater chance of hearing Carolyn Parrish praise the Bush
administration.

But I digress. Time and time again, we have women demanding access to boys' teams and boys' clubs.

Remember Robyn Waite? She's the Ontario high school girl who plays
quarterback on the boys' football team. Before her, there was Justine
Blainey and Hayley Wickenheiser, who fought for and won the right to skate
with the boys. And the LPGA wasn't good enough for Annika Sorenstam, so she decided to tee off with the men during a 2003 PGA tournament.

It seems that every time a female voice challenges a male team, the guys are eventually forced to swing open their door and welcome the newest member. But the door doesn't swing both ways.

Female athletes continue to have the luxury of maintaining girls' teams and
girls' clubs. Guys no longer have that right. And that's discrimination.

When Brian Kontak realized that he couldn't earn a living playing in the
PGA, he wanted to try his luck with the LPGA. The women were not amused.

Now, there's a boy in Wisconsin who wants to compete on his high school's
gymnastic team. Only problem is that his school doesn't have a team for
boys. So, hoping to earn a scholarship in order to attend college, Keith
Michael Bukowski wants the chance to spring vault and somersault with the
ladies. Kudos to the young lad for making a point, but hopefully he's not
holding his breath.

The truth is, equality isn't so important for feminists when the person
seeking parity is a guy. Equal treatment only applies when it benefits
women. And that's why feminism just doesn't add up.
#45
Father's Issues / A positive piece of press
Dec 23, 2004, 10:50:33 AM
Change is taking place.


Hot off the press from the Christian Science Monitor:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1223/p04s01-woeu.html


...... the campaign (set to be repeated in the US as the group launches in New York next month) has worked.

Suddenly, there seems to be greater acceptance that troubled youngsters are often the product of broken homes. The opposition Conservatives are already proposing the notion of shared parenting, whereby custody would be split, a practice more common in New Zealand, Australia, and the US.

"Conservatives believe that there should be a strong legal presumption in favor of both parents having equal rights in the upbringing of their children," said leader Michael Howard recently.
#46
Another anecdote for those who claim that bias and other bad behavior doesn't flow profusely from the domestic courts (Licking County Juvenile Judge Robert Hoover). Judge Robert Hoover I hope you read this article:

http://www.newarkadvocate.com/news/stories/20041221/localnews/1771539.html


Scott Strohm
Ohio Class Action Coordinator

--------------------------------------------------------

Mom obtains custody, child support
Former missing girl wants to stay with mother
By LACHELLE SEYMOUR
Advocate Reporter


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



NEWARK -- Sheri Lyn Taylor, a Johnstown woman who allegedly disappeared from her California home nine years ago with her daughter, retained residential custody of the girl Monday after six hours of negotiations.

Taylor will also receive child support from the girl's father, David Brancheau,
who will have regular visitation rights.

Authorities allege Taylor left California with her daughter Vanesa Brancheau, in 1995, gave her the assumed name of Ariel Rose Taylor, and lived in Kansas City, Mo., Daytona Beach, Fla., and Pataskala before moving to Johnstown.

She claims she left California because she was afraid David could harm them.

The two were found living in Johnstown in July after a woman recognized Vanesa's picture from the Web site of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

Taylor received temporary physical custody of her daughter, now 14, in September after a two-day hearing in front of Licking County Juvenile Judge Robert Hoover.


David Brancheau, of Auburn Hills, Mich., will pay $425 per month in child
support, plus processing fees. He can visit with his daughter every fifth
weekend of the year, and four to six weeks in the summer.

Brancheau says the final agreement rewards Taylor for keeping his child away from him.

"I feel I had 14 years of parental alienation I didn't cause, and I'm left
holding the bag," he said.

He went along with the plan because Vanesa wanted to live with her mother, he said.

Vanesa will be covered under her mother's health insurance plans, but David
Brancheau will be temporarily responsible for 67 percent of any uncovered
extraordinary expenses for the girl. Both parents will share travel necessary
for extended visitations, like those during holidays or spring and summer break, and will pay attorney and court fees.

Taylor and Brancheau must also avoid making "disparaging" remarks about each other.

Although Taylor's custody issue appears to be over, she faces felony charges of forgery and interference with custody for actions allegedly taken during her nine-year run from her daughter's father. Taylor allegedly used false documents for school enrollment in the Southwest Licking School District, sparking the forgery charge.

Last month, Taylor chose to be charged by a bill of information, which waived her rights to indictment and review by jury.

Taylor's attorney, John OBora, said he is happy with the outcome of the custody hearing, but declined to comment further citing Taylor's upcoming review for the diversion program.

Acceptance into that program would allow her to avoid jail time for the felony charges and would be similar to serving probation. OBora believes his client would be a good candidate for diversion, but said she will likely enter a plea if she is not accepted.

Reporter Lachelle Seymour can be reached at (740) 328-8546 or
lseymour@n...



Originally published Tuesday, December 21, 200

#47
----- Original Message -----
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 6:45 AM
Subject: US Court of Appeals rule that custodial parents must account for C/S


The second highest courts in the land, the U.S. Courts of Appeals have
ruled that custodial parents have to account for how they spend child
support.  This is precedential law of the land, since now other court has
overruled it, and with all probability no other US Court of Appeal would
reverse it.  All state domestic relations courts must follow this ruling
and order that custodial parents account for how they spend the child
support on the child.


"Although the noncustodial parent has a duty to provide financial support,
the custodial parent must also demonstrate that he or she is using that
money for the care and upbringing of the child".

U.S. v. Lewko, 269 F.3d 64, 68 (1st Cir. 2001).



Wood v. Ostrander, 879 F.2d 583 (9th Cir. 1989):

"Opinion from another circuit sufficient to establish legal principle if
there is none in the circuit involved."





Bruce Eden, Director, Fathers Rights Association of New Jersey &
Mid-Atlantic Region DADS (Dads Against Discrimination)--New Jersey & New York Chapters
#48
Father's Issues / FUNNY
Dec 21, 2004, 06:36:22 AM






#49
From:  "Teri"
Date:  Thu Dec 16, 2004  12:22 pm
Subject:  Radio documentary producer is looking for a father like you



I've been in contact with a radio documentary producer who is working
on a 4-part story for the BBC. It is on the unjust and biased family
court laws and procedures in 4 countries. This producer is covering
the United States.

She is looking for a man to interview who has been devastated by the
laws and procedures after a divorce. The thing is, the man's story
can not include a move-away, violence, drugs, a question of paternity,
or mental illness. If your story fits the bill please email me
privately and I'll put you in touch with her.

Thanks,
Teri
http://www.amnesty-4-families.org
#50
Father's Issues / Would like your response.
Dec 15, 2004, 11:09:26 AM
What do you think of the WAL-MART shirts - BOYS ARE STUPID:THROW ROCKS AT THEM, - BOYS ARE PIGS.  

One of the responses I got from this post was:

Author: Holly

"I am sorry but these shirts make me laugh. Actually my 12 year old son and I saw one and started cracking up. I heard when Dr. Laura had started talking about how bad these products are but I really think we are taking ourselves a little to seriously sometimes. I really like the ones with the cartoon rabbits that say funny things like "Shut up I don't care" and stupid things like that. I have one in my office that says boys are smelly."


>>>=====<<<

Here is the post

>>>=====<<<


BOYCOTT WAL-MART - Canada and U.S.A. –
BOYS ARE STUPID:THROW ROCKS AT THEM, - BOYS ARE PIGS

________________________


Dear Mr. Wilson,
Thank you for your e-mail as follow up to our conversation earlier today. I've asked one of my associates to research this issue. We will follow up with you once we have completed our review of this situation.
Sincerely,
Andrew Pelletier

ANDREW PELLETIER
DIRECTOR OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
WAL-MART CANADA CORP.
PHONE: 905 821-2111, EXT. 4585
CELL: 416-433-0929
FAX: 905 821-6828


===================================

----HACKal Message-----
From: Grant Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004
To: Andrew Pelletier

Subject: BOYS ARE STUPID:THROW ROCKS AT THEM - Misandric Child hate products


Mr. Andrew Pelletier
Director, Public Affairs
Walmart Canada Corp.
1940 Argentia Rd.
Mississauga, Ontario Canada L5N 1P9
v 905-821-2111
fax 905-821-6399

Dear Mr. Pelletier,

Re: Misandric hate clothing and other products sold by Walmart containing such slogans as:
"BOYS ARE FROM THE STUPID FACTORY".
"BOYS ARE STUPID; THROW ROCKS AT THEM", "BOYS ARE PIGS"
designed and/or manufactured by David and Goliath of Clearwater Florida.

You can view some of these products on the Walmart Online ordering at your website at:

http://www.walmart.com/catalog/product.gsp?product_id=2616335&cat=64038&
type=3&dept=3920&path=0:3920:58437:64038

You can read more about these slogans on our website under "Child Hate Crimes" at
http://www.canadiancrc.com/Hatred.htm

I was very disappointed this morning to find out that Walmart in the U.S.A. was selling these hate products.

A human rights complaint has been filed against another national retailer in Canada, Bluenotes, a division of American Eagle Outfitters.

I asked you to confirm that Walmart is selling these products in Canada.

In any event, they are selling them in the U.S.A.

It is our position that since Walmart Canada is a wholly owned subsidiary of Walmart of the U.S.A., it should be boycotted whether or not these specific items are sold in your Canadian stores.

You stated in our conversation this afternoon that you will look into the matter.

Regards,

Grant Wilson
President
Canadian Children's Rights Council
357 Eglinton Ave. W., Suite 905
Toronto, ON M5N 1A3
416-410-6858

Visit our website at //www.CanadianCRC.com for current news on Canadian children's rights.
#51
Father's Issues / Repulsive Posting
Dec 08, 2004, 10:50:08 AM
I am copy/paste a post Lawmoe made.  Please email this student !!!  
[email protected]
____________________________________

Author: Lawmoe
Date:   12-08-04 13:32

Here is some fodder for the grist mill. The following post appeares on Divorce Source on one of the bulletin boards. The gender bias of the entire question is repulsive. I believe that we should let this student know how we feel.

____________________________________

hi,

I am a third year journalism student and am writing about how much access fathers should have to their children and am looking for opinions of those who have gone through this.

Please could you let me know your opinion on a few of the following things:

how much do you think a child should see there father? Is it better for them to not see them at all than to see them when the father "has time" i.e fitting the child around the rest of his life causing him to be unreliable? What effect do you think this has on the child?

Thanks

If you would rather email your replies instead of posting them on here my address is [email protected]
#52
Father's Issues / CSEA TV Report
Dec 07, 2004, 08:45:15 AM
From: Chad Kennedy [mailto:ckennedy4@w...]

I have to say that I was very disappointed in the story on channel 7 news(WHIO TV Dayton, Ohio).

First, it was reported as a call into waste busters, which it was not. It was a response email to the deadbeat story they aired. Second, they aired about 15 seconds of a 15 minute conversation and the only thing they had me saying on behalf of noncustodial parents was that when a man gets into arrears they should ask why. And third, they aired the remaining majority of the story about a lady who had been after her ex for 17 years and was behind $45,000 complete with showing his picture and her opinion that they should get even tougher.

Jim Otte stated father's would take their fight to Columbus next year when Ohio considers changes and Cheryl McHenery ended with how there is X billion dollars owed by noncustodial parents.

I apologize for the let down as I had been approached by many after seeing the promising advertisements that perhaps a fraction of our issues would be broadcast. I warned with caution that we don't know how the story will be framed when it finally airs. We are, however, used to this disappointment like Don Hubin being told his minority report would not be included in the final recommendations from the guideline council to the legislature.

 There are those that do put out the entire story, like the newspaper I recently said would publish my editorial in it's entirety and who wants to do a follow-up story on the facts. I hope that everyone shares their disappointment with channel 7 by emailing Jim Otte and letting him know where you have been.   Otte, Jim (CBI-Dayton); 7online@w...  Channel 7 Report


I have my own questions like, Jim:

1. Where was the fact that the recommendations by the council include a 23-1117% increase in support (you had a picture of the report)?

2. Why are noncustodial parents held to the unattainable standard of nevergetting sick, never becoming disabled, and never losing a job in a poor economy?

3. Why is the noncustodial parent representative's minority report not being included in the final recommendations like it was in the two councils prior (you had a picture of this report, too)?

4. Why can they take 50% of a payers gross pay and still expect him to live (actually 65% or 55% if you have subsequent children)?

5. Why they aren't looking at the flaws in the income shares model when there is more appropriate models like cost shares?

6. Why is paternity fraud condoned OR kids treated unequally in and out of an order OR judges not granting deviations when noncustodial parents request it?

7. Why are we using the term deadbeat when the largest federally funded study into the matter found they don't exist in significant numbers (you had a picture of the book)?

8. Why are we not looking at the fact that CSEA is a revenue producing entity of the state so it behooves them to make awards as high and as long as they can?

9. Why is Ohio a deadbeat state that is holding over $33,000,000 in undistributed child support that has already been paid?

10. Why, when a third of noncustodial parents reside with custodial parents, are we condoning practices that are hurting the very kids the CSEA is supposed to be helping by letting these kids watch their stepparents being taken from their home in handcuffs?

11. Why aren't we encouraging equal parenting when research has shown that involved parents support their children?


 I have lots of questions especially since I know all of these facts were laid out for Mr. Otte when he came to my home and these are the facts that sit at the heart of the problem.

Things, like I said, will get worse under the current more aggressive policies CSEA is adopting. Like I also said, you can invent 7 new ways to squeeze a turnip but you will still not get blood. Mr. Galluzo and Daufel were here when this interview took place and can attest to the fact that these issues were laid out and probably share my amazement at this being the best reporting that could be done.

Mr. Otte, when and if you reply, please "reply all" to share your feedback with everyone so that we might understand why the story was aired in the manner it was. For those that didn't see it, I'm in the process of trying to get the necessary drivers so that the captured video clip can be put on the forum. We all know when these things are fixed, the arrearage problem will take care of itself.

All I can say, Mr. Otte, is that I hope you never have to experience these things first hand. We'll certainly be in touch when things move to the legislature, or when channel 7 airs bent point of views, but will certainly proceed with caution.

Please forward this email to anyone you know in the channel 7 viewing area.

Chad Kennedy

Concerned father of three wonderful children.

For more info on father and noncustodial parent rights, check out these sites:
//www.pacegroup.org
//www.ancpr.org
//www.milliondadsmarch.org
#53
Father's Issues / Everyone is Saying...
Dec 08, 2004, 08:52:52 AM
 .
#54
Father's Issues / OHIO’ins
Dec 03, 2004, 09:18:17 AM
If you are in OHIO please visit OhioClassAction http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OhioClassAction/?yguid=188167906

The group is trying to develop a database on all the counties in our state.

>>> ===== <<<


POSTED by James Hardy at OhioClassAction

From my perspective, the best approach for a database is to only use
Œquantitative¹ measures ¬ numbers that are as objective as possible. That would include:

1. Incomes of the parties.
2. Age of the parties.
3. Who filed first.
4. The basis for granting the divorce and by who (mutual incompatibility would be a no-fault, where as anything else would require a determination of fault and could affect the ruling.)
4. Length of the marriage.
5. Amount and duration of spousal support ¬ if any.
6. Number of children.
7. Type of custody ¬ sole vs. shared and mom vs. dad
8. If either party requested shared custody.
9. Any deviation from the calculated amount of child support.

I'm sure that there are other things that could also be used.

From the above information, it should be possible to establish track records for spousal support (normalized for length of marriage and incomes), any bias in custody rulings and if the court is encouraging involvement by both parents.

If it is possible to just have your Clerk of Courts pull files so you can find the information, that would be the best and least expensive approach.

That wouldn¹t be practical for larger counties. For example, Cuyahoga
County has 5 judges in the domestic relations division and Lord only knows how many magistrates.

Jim

#55
Father's Issues / marriage a gamble for men.
Dec 02, 2004, 01:26:30 PM
http://www.insightmag.com/news/2000/05/29/Symposium/Q.Does.It.Pay.For.Men.In.America.To.Marry.And.Raise.Children-208451.shtml



Q: Does it pay for men in America to marry and raise children?

NO!: High divorce rates and biased laws have made marriage a gamble for too many men.
By Jed. H. Abraham

If you're like most men, you're married or you hope to marry some day. You think you deserve to live happily ever after but, if things don't work out that way, you'll get a civilized divorce and move on. You'll stay pals with your ex-wife and you'll see your kids as often as you want.

You have no idea what you're getting into.........................


(check out link to read rest of article)
http://www.insightmag.com/news/2000/05/29/Symposium/Q.Does.It.Pay.For.Men.In.America.To.Marry.And.Raise.Children-208451.shtml


#56
Hammer A Spammer - "SPAM Vampire"

My internet host called me this morning and ask if I was running anything last night that did a lot of down loads.

I said "Yes, I've been running a program called Spam Vampire"

He asked me not to run it.   I said ok, BUT email the reason why it is not good to run the program over night so I can post it.   Here is his email.



Bolivar,

Running the Spam Vampire website is definitely not a good idea for a few reasons.

The main purpose of Spam Vampire is to put spammers out of business by creating huge bandwidth costs for them.  The reality of the situation, however, is that the bandwidth must come from somewhere, and that somewhere is your ISP.  This raises our cost of doing business just as much as it does the spammers, which can in turn raise the price of your broadband service.  Spam Vampire also ends up doing the exact same thing as most viruses, completely filling up an internet connection with data so that no one else would be able to utilize that connection.

I know you are frustrated by spammers, but this method will end up costing much more for the internet providers than for the spammers.

Respectfully,
David Stanfill
Technical Response Team
Wilkshire Communications Inc.
#57
From Housekeeping Monthly   13 May 1955                                  

                            THE GOOD WIFE'S GUIDE


•   Have dinner ready. Plan ahead, even the night before, to have a delicious meal ready, on time for his return. This is a way of letting him know that you have been thinking of him and are concerned about his needs. Most men are hungry when they come home and the prospect of a good meal (especially his favorite dish) is part of the warm welcome needed.

•   Prepare yourself. Take 15 minutes to rest so you'll be refreshed when he arrives. Touch up your make-up, put a ribbon in your hair and be fresh looking. He has just been with a lot of work-weary people.

•   Be a little gay and a little more interesting for him. His boring day may need a lift and one of your duties is to provide it for him.

•   Clear away the clutter. Make one more trip through the main part of the house just before your husband arrives.

•   Gather up schoolbooks, toys, paper etc. and then run a dustcloth over the tables.

•   Over the cooler months of the year you should prepare and light a fire for him to unwind by. You husband will fell he has reached a haven of rest and order, and it will give you a lift too. After all, catering for his comfort will provide you with immense personal satisfaction.

•   Prepare the children. Take a few minutes to wash the children's hands and faces (if they are small), comb their hair and, if necessary, change their clothes. Minimize all noise. At the time of his arrival, eliminate all noise of the washer, dryer or vacuum. Try to encourage the children to be quiet.

•   Be happy to see him.

•   Greet him with a warm smile and show sincerity in your desire to please him.

•   Listen to him. You may have a dozen important things to tell him, but the moment of his arrival is not the time. Let him talk first – remember, his topics of conversation are more important than yours.

•   Make the evening his. Never complain if he comes home late or goes out to dinner, or other places of entertainment without you. Instead, try to understand his world of strain and pressure and his very real need to be at home and relax.

•   Your goal: Try to make sure your home is a place of peace, order and tranquility where your husband can renew himself in body and spirit.

•   Don't greet him with complaints and problems.

•   Don't complain if he comes late for dinner, or even if he stays out all night. Count this as minor compared to what he might have gone through that day.

•   Make him comfortable. Have him lean back in a comfortable chair or have him lie down in the bedroom. Have a cool or warm drink ready for him.

•   Arrange his pillow and offer to take off his shoes. Speak in a low, soothing and pleasant voice.

•   Don't ask him questions about his actions or question his judgment or integrity. Remember, he is the master of the house and as such will always exercise his will with fairness and truthfulness. You have no right to question him.

•   A good wife always knows her place.  
#58
URGENT !!! RIGHT NOW !!!

WE JUST MADE CNN HEADLINE NEWS WITH THE CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS, and they are asking viewers to respond to today's public poll - "Barring unusual circumstances, should parents have an equal right to custody of their children?"

email [email protected] with YOUR beliefs RIGHT NOW, telling them a BRIEF and CLEAR "YES" statement.

EMAIL TO: [email protected]

URGENT !!! TELL EVERYONE ELSE TO DO THIS RIGHT NOW !!!
(October 8th, 2004 - approx 8:55am)
THIS IS WHAT YOU HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR !!!!!!!!!!!!!

------------------------------
Mr. Torm L. Howse
President, Indiana Civil Rights Council
[email protected]
http://www.indianacrc.org

--------------------
Equality is not a difficult concept



>>>====<<<<


Ed Ward, MD, MT Email to them. Please send your own. We have a chance for exposure. Let us not miss the opportunity.

Send to: [email protected]

Dear Judy and Thomas of CNN,

I would like to thank you for offering exposure for Family's Constitutional Rights. The Constitutional Rights of The People and Famlies have been devastated over the last few decades by both democrats and republicans without any notice from the national press.

Of course, The Constitution of America and I believe, "A parent is a parent and neither parent should be given more access, financial responsibility, ability to care and nurture their child based on a "heavy hand or unequal eye" that deprives a child of BOTH parent's protection and care." http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/04/09/01/ward.htm How can any American deny the Rights Granted in the Constitution unless they have illegitimate or fascist motives? Specific information on denial Louisiana's Family Rights. http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/04/09/15/ward.htm

Are you aware of the Federal Class Action lawsuit currently filed against 38 states? http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/04/09/03/press.htm

Are you aware that the representatives of The People can not get answers for "How many of The People have been Caged for "Encouragement?" http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/04/09/02/ward.htm Incarceration without notice of numbers is a prime requisite for "Political Prisoners" and has no place in this Constitutional Republic. Political prisoners are only the result of a Fascist Regime.

Are you aware of the denial of Constitutional Property Rights? http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/04/09/09/ward.htm

Are you aware of the denial of Individual Constitutional protections? http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/04/10/06/ward.htm In this case a 6 year old child was abducted for interrogation by this fascist government without any Constitutional protections or any response for stopping this culpability. It was just Constitutional abuses as usual for this government.

Are you aware of the denial of Constitutional protections in Domestic Violence criminal courts? http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/04/09/20/ward.htm It's not just Family Court that has removed Constitutional protections.

Are you aware that every 45 minutes a father snuffs himself via suicide. http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/w/ward/03/ward072703.htm

Are you aware that a disability as good as a "death sentence" for any Non Custodial Parent? For the disabled are not disabled, they are merely "underemployed" in Family Court.

Are you aware of the national press assisting in "doctored" news releases, lack of releases, classified releases, and ignoring these abuses against The People of America? http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/04/09/03/ward.htm

Are you aware of this governments abuses to our soldiers? http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/04/09/07/ward.htm

Are you aware that James Madison called "this government" "A Distorted, Bastardized and Illegitimate government from his grave? http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/04/09/09/ward.htm

Are you aware of Mike Cox's, Attorney General for Michigan, recent deceit? Where Dominoes Pizza corporation was linked with his courtroom fanaticism on a billboard without their knowledge?

Are you aware that there is one Viable presidential candidate that has aligned himself with the Constitutional in all aspects of government? http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/04/09/24/press.htm Viable only if the national press will allow his platform to be seen by the voters. Apparently, the national press feels that some useless trivia of war records, or any thing else is more important than covering the Basic Rights of Every American being destroyed by this government?

Are you aware that one of the major parties (the Tory or Conservative Party) in England will soon be advocating Family Rights as part of their main platform?

So while the oppressed are extremely grateful for this exposure of one aspect of this government abuses against it's own citizens and people, SO MUCH MORE IS NEEDED.

Ed Ward, MD, MT



#59
Father's Issues / Humor
Sep 02, 2004, 08:04:17 AM
What Makes 100%?

What does it mean to give MORE than 100%

Ever wonder about those people who say they are giving more than 100%? We have all been to those meetings where someone wants you to give over 100%. How about achieving 103%? What makes up 100% in life? ????

Here's a little mathematical formula that might help you answer these questions:

If:
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z is represented as:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26.

Then:

H-A-R-D-W-O-R-K
8+1+18+4+23+15+18+11 = 98%

and

K-N-O-W-L-E-D-G-E
11+14+15+23+12+5+4+7+5 = 96%

But,

A-T-T-I-T-U-D-E
1+20+20+9+20+21+4+5 = 100%


And,

B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T
2+21+12+12+19+8+9+20 = 103%

AND, look how far ass kissing will take you.

A-S-S-K-I-S-S-I-N-G
1+19+19+11+9+19+19+9+14+7 = 118%

So, one can conclude with mathematical certainty that While Hard work and Knowledge will get you close,, - and Attitude will get you there,, - it's the Bullshit and Ass kissing that will put you over the top
#60
Father's Issues / Selling a political party
Aug 27, 2004, 09:27:26 AM
A copy/paste from an email sent to me. I know it's long.

Their is a presadental candidate who is Pro Father!!


After a canned speech calling for the normal Libertarian platform changes in what we call government, when being police,  Michael Badnarik, Libertarian Nominee for the Presidency of U.S. of A., was asked in writing about Child abuse and CPS [Child Protection Services].
 
  In less than 2 minute answer,  Mr. BADNARIK, who is now showing in polls that include him in Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota up from Zero [when he was NOT included in polls] to 1.5% and in a recent poll 3% in N.M.  BEFORE he started running Tv adds,  said, ~ I would do all I can to abolish CPS,  communities, friends and neighbors should be responsible for deciding IF they will get personally involved to stop.  If it is not serious enough for YOU to be involved, personally, it probably does not rise to the level to justify taking the children away.   He went on to elaborate that 75% of child abuse happens IN Foster care , AFTER the children have been taken from their natural parents.
 
   I have it on my TV show, actually footage, so anyone can see and hear PRECISELY what the Libertarian Presidential nominee SAID.
 
 *** Fathers and Childrens Rights groups now have a Presidential champion!  Abolish CPS, it does far more harm than good, and their is no constitutional provision to permit it to even exit.
 
    //www.Badnarik.org  should have a position paper on the web site by September 1, Allen Hacker, the California Badnarik Coordinator assured me tonight.  Regardless, I'll have that on my Tv show airing locally by this weekend.
 
    Badnarik remains the ONLY presidential hopeful to declare the CPS system UNFIT to care for anyones children.  It is all about the money and building Government Empires of power  O V E R parents.... not the best interests of the children.
 
   I am only sending this to you Fathers Rights Groups.  Pass it on to the other 1000+ groups.

Fathers Rights have a champion.  His name is Michael Badnarik, and he and hundreds of other Libertarians are on all 50 state ballots this November.
 
   If you want the screwing you been getting by the Courts, President Clinton, Bush, then vote for the two parties which create and maintain the FAMILY  destruction machine.  you know... theDemocrats and Republicrats.   The definition of insanity, is to continue to do what  you have always done, and expect a different result.!!
 
   If  you want to send a strong message to abolish CPS, END Court FORCED child support, and grant both parents EQUAL time [barring one is in jail or
whacko],  Michael BADNARIK is you candidate.
 
   Now, if you don't check out //www.Badnarik.org  and click on his EVENTS calendar, find out when he will be NEAR you and go thank him for standing up for DADS, and do all you can to get him INTO the October Debates, then you DADS deserve what you have been getting.

 Freedom is not Free, and many Dads are sitting in jail as I write this, because they were NOT VIGILLANTE about guarding their civil liberties.  BADNARIK and the Libertarians are the medicine we need to heal Americas civil Rights abuses on a lot of issue, but none more cherished than this one.
 
    And spread the word.
 
William J. Wagener
805-928-1100
//www.OnSecondthought.tv