The right of refusal states:
"There shall be a right of first refusal with regard to caring for the children. Each parent should be present with the children during parenting time. If one parent is unable to care for the children for more than 4 hours during his/her parenting time, that parent shall offer the other parent the option of providing care for the children prior to engaging the services of anyone else. The children shall specifically not be left with baby-sitters, compensated or not compensated, friend or family unless the other parent first declines the opportunity to provide care for the children. The parent exercising the right of first refusal shall return the children shall return the children at the time specified by the parent unable to care for the children."
My understanding is the intent is so the children are not left with sitters.
NCP did not want to assist with summer camp. Now NCP parent lost/quit their job and is now invoking this clause to get kids while CP is at work during the day.
NCP having kids has caused all sort of issues and contempt charges about 12 counts have been filed.
Is the intent of right of refusal clause so that other parent can become primary just by quutting job?
How would courts be petitioned to stop NCP from abusing right of refusal clause? What arguments should be used?
NCP now under impression they cannot look for job or pay support because they have kids all day?
How would you reword right of refusal paragraph so that kids can enjoy being with CP's family at least three days mon, tues, wed as NCP has them every thursday,friday and every other weekend?
"There shall be a right of first refusal with regard to caring for the children. Each parent should be present with the children during parenting time. If one parent is unable to care for the children for more than 4 hours during his/her parenting time, that parent shall offer the other parent the option of providing care for the children prior to engaging the services of anyone else. The children shall specifically not be left with baby-sitters, compensated or not compensated, friend or family unless the other parent first declines the opportunity to provide care for the children. The parent exercising the right of first refusal shall return the children shall return the children at the time specified by the parent unable to care for the children."
My understanding is the intent is so the children are not left with sitters.
NCP did not want to assist with summer camp. Now NCP parent lost/quit their job and is now invoking this clause to get kids while CP is at work during the day.
NCP having kids has caused all sort of issues and contempt charges about 12 counts have been filed.
Is the intent of right of refusal clause so that other parent can become primary just by quutting job?
How would courts be petitioned to stop NCP from abusing right of refusal clause? What arguments should be used?
NCP now under impression they cannot look for job or pay support because they have kids all day?
How would you reword right of refusal paragraph so that kids can enjoy being with CP's family at least three days mon, tues, wed as NCP has them every thursday,friday and every other weekend?