>>One point that goes in hand with that Baby is, when a NCP
>>made an obligor by a court, agency, employee of the state,
>>many times at a high amount, such person is therefor made to
>>get a higher paying job, or even another job, which in turn
>>used against said individual to reduce visatation which is
>>directly correlated to ones support, which then is raised
>>again for supposed lack of time with said child.
>And I"m STILL waiting for you to provide evidence that this
>happens with any reasonable frequency.
>As it is, I'm the only one who has provided ANY factual
Are you saying that IF a NCP goes out and gets a "high paying job" or "another job" and that person income goes up the support obligation remains the same?
Also as I pointed out you provided factual evidence to a question not asked here. You provided stats to the fact that child support
is being paid period not that is is a fair amount or that the "system is working" for well anybody really. Some CP's are probably getting less than they are due and some NCP's are probably paying more than they should. There isn't going to be stats on what is asked here because nobody is going to admit they are screwing over the system in thier favor except the people who are being screwed over. My boyfriend is in your 89% of people the gov is saying the system works for is it really working for him? NO! But because he is paying this excess amount on time and not with holding funds he is counted as such.