I agree. They are making a whole lot of assumptions that have no merit legally, or from a socio-psychological standpoint. Many people who abuse their partners never abuse their children, and vice-versa.
I think both parties are responsible for the fighting going on in front of the daughter. The old saying "it takes two to tango" is true enough. If he's a good father that's what matters. Why don't they suggest counseling for the parents or supervised exchanges by a court appointed gaurdian?
The columnists also don't consider the possibility that this woman could be making false allegations against her ex. That is more and more common these days, yet people are always quick to side with the woman and make the guy out to be the problem with no evidence, just a "scorned" woman's word.
Sad. It's really sad. They need new columnists.
I think both parties are responsible for the fighting going on in front of the daughter. The old saying "it takes two to tango" is true enough. If he's a good father that's what matters. Why don't they suggest counseling for the parents or supervised exchanges by a court appointed gaurdian?
The columnists also don't consider the possibility that this woman could be making false allegations against her ex. That is more and more common these days, yet people are always quick to side with the woman and make the guy out to be the problem with no evidence, just a "scorned" woman's word.
Sad. It's really sad. They need new columnists.