i guess i am posing my questions for possible arguments with a new judge. my attorney has a plan to disqualify this judge and is certain that it will work because he says that in FL we are given one 'free' disqualification of the judge. a second time would be questioned.... we would have evidence.
in fact there is a new law that states that if the judge sits on the recusal motion for 30 days the motion is automatically granted. my attorney isn't certain, but suspects that this judge may not know of this because of his dislike for new law.
i don't think it is a good idea for me to reveal the details here, but if you would like to know the details of the plan i would happily email it to you.
however, initially i believe my attorney's original goal was to do as you say and to be very precise in our discovery at this time to be prepared for appeal (that is since this judge does not recognize medical issues).
so what do you think about my questions on case law and my arguments for the new judge?
in fact there is a new law that states that if the judge sits on the recusal motion for 30 days the motion is automatically granted. my attorney isn't certain, but suspects that this judge may not know of this because of his dislike for new law.
i don't think it is a good idea for me to reveal the details here, but if you would like to know the details of the plan i would happily email it to you.
however, initially i believe my attorney's original goal was to do as you say and to be very precise in our discovery at this time to be prepared for appeal (that is since this judge does not recognize medical issues).
so what do you think about my questions on case law and my arguments for the new judge?