SPARC Forums
		Main Forums => Dear Socrateaser => Topic started by: mudbunnies on Nov 25, 2003, 04:00:44 AM
		
			
			
				morning Soc
i posted this on the old board but couldn't get back to it so see if you replied so if this is duplicate work for u my most sincere apologies.
background;
child support case & family case now in same county, father files to consolidate, judge grants, below is the proposed order;
In the matter of;      Case No. xxxxx
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
On behalf of:
   xxxxxx
      Petitioner
v.
   xxxxxx
      Respondent
__________________________
and in the matter of;      Case No; xxxxxx
   
xxxxx
      Petitioner/Father
      and
xxxxx
      Respondent/Mother
____________________________________
      
ORDER ON MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
THIS CAUSE came before the court on November 18, 2003 upon the Respondent/Father's Motion to Consolidate.  The Father being pro se and appearing telephonically, the Mother and her counsel being present and the Department having filed a Notice of No Contest, the court having reviewed its file and hearing arguments of the parties, it is;
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED;
1. The Motion to Consolidate is hereby GRANTED.
2. The child support action in Brevard county shall be consolidated with the family/paternity action in Brevard county
3. The older case shall be the remaining case number, which is case number 05-2003-DR-047595.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Viera, Brevard County, Florida this ___ day of _____________, 2003
1.  Does this look ok?
2.  Should the remaining case style be first, or the case style where the original motion was filed
3.  Am I forgeting anything here?
thanks
			
			
			
				>In the matter of;      Case No. xxxxx
>
>STATE OF FLORIDA
>DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
>On behalf of:
>
>   xxxxxx
>      Petitioner
>v.
>
>   xxxxxx
>      Respondent
>__________________________
>
In the matter of;      Case No; xxxxxx
>   
>xxxxx
>      Petitioner/Father
>
>      and
>
>xxxxx
>      Respondent/Mother
>____________________________________
>      
>ORDER ON MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
>
>THIS CAUSE came before the court on November 18, 2003 upon the
>Respondent/Father's Motion to Consolidate.  The Father being
>pro se and appearing telephonically, the Mother and her
>counsel being present and the Department having filed a Notice
>of No Contest, the court having reviewed its file and hearing
>arguments of the parties, it is;
>
>ORDERED AND ADJUDGED;
>
>1. The Motion to Consolidate is hereby GRANTED.
>
>2. The child support action in Brevard county shall be
>consolidated with the family/paternity action in Brevard
>county.
>
>3. The older case shall be the remaining case number, which is
>case number 05-2003-DR-047595.
>
>DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Viera, Brevard County, Florida
>this ___ day of _____________, 2003
>
>
>1.  Does this look ok?
Yep.
>2.  Should the remaining case style be first, or the case
>style where the original motion was filed
The continuning case should lead.
>3.  Am I forgeting anything here?
Yes, send me a check.