Received in email, 07-24-2005.
Your web site is not the appropriate approach to helping dads fight for visitation and I am offended by what I have read. If you want to help foster the parent – child contact you should avoid words such as -bogus argument, her duty to the child and any other negative connotations. You should emphasize the best interest of the child. I am a breastfeeding mother with no objections to letting a dead beat dad have his day in court but I don't agree with the bogus argument of breastfeeding and did not use it as an excuse.
If you really want to foster a good relationship with both parents, tell the guy to keep his dick in his pants and his fists of the woman and for Christ's sake, love and adore the child, not foster the hate relationship.
Regards,
Appalled Mother
[email protected]
Once again, it's all the man's fault, and mothers apparently have no responsibility in the making of a baby. Only "dead beat dads". The depth of this woman's hypocracy is breathtaking.
Feel free to write her and express your opinion. (But don't expect an intelligent response from anyone whose email address is an abbreviation of "go f*ck a monkey".)
I have yet to see a post negative with BOTH FIT PARENTS being active with their child. Only the trolls how pop in from time to time.
Apparently, this is the case. Someone who does not see the VALUE of a FATHER.
This is a very respected site. Must be someone from??????
She must have been the monkey who got "f*cked" and is now regretting it....
Showing her bad taste and judgement for all to see.
"...no objections to LETTING a deadbeat dad have his day in court.."
There is no LETTING of one person over another to "have his day in court"....odd that this is the perception by the email-er.
I suspect this person is about to go to court and well, may be loosing what control she has over the situation. Or may have tried and lost.
Plenty of deadbeat mothers out there too, by the way.
Shame shame shame.
Also, notice how she brought up that she's a 'breastfeeding' mother....I hate when women use that argument to keep the father from their children....funny, breast pumps have been around for quite some time now....
:o
Clearly, a woman scorned. And her "ex" man will pay for the rest of his life, by having many, many days in court with her and lots of child support and missed visitations. Also, she's a breast feeding hypocrit, fostering a hate relationship with her child's father by forcing him to have his day in court.
>
>Your web site is not the appropriate approach to helping dads
>fight for visitation and I am offended by what I have read.
Offended? Or SCARED her ex will find this site? ;)
her email address is a solicitation for services that she would like to receive.
Clearly SPARK and the information here scares the crap out of this woman.
who is about to be royalled screwed by a mother who has no real concern for the welfare of her own child... instead looking after her own $$welfare$$ and her own power trips.
My prayers go with this child ... he will need them.
Lactation is simply a natural occurrence, not a reflection of particularly advanced parenting.
On the other hand, the male emperor penguin is the one who keeps the egg warm, balancing it on his feet and under the fold of his belly for two months. He doesn't eat, and he huddles with other male emperor penguins to try to avoid dying in -30 degree Antarctic weather. (yeah, yeah, my daughter and I recently went to see the movie March of the Penguins).
But... as to not personalize that either, it's simply a reflection that nature finds importance in both genders when it comes to parenting.
:)
I did respond, this is what I had to say...
You are sad and disgusting! You ARE the reason this web site is in existance. Not all dads in this world are "dead beat dads" and dead beat or not, they can not make babies alone. Funny he wasn't a "dead beat" when you laid down with him and in the off chance he was, you still laid down with him, so what exactly does that make you?
Well lets see I was a single mom with a true dead beat I BREAST FED, AND PUMPED, so his family could also fee our child.
and the statement about keeping his penis his pants, obvioulsy she didn't keep her LEGS CLOSED
What a nut bag.
>>Your web site is not the appropriate approach to helping dads fight for visitation and I am offended by what I have read.<<
I have gained great insights from this web-site over the past 5 years which have been directly instrumental in assisting me to win not only VISITION BUT CUSTODY of my child. NO WONDER MONKEY LOVE HATES THE SITE!!!
>>If you want to help foster the parent ? child contact you should avoid words such as -bogus argument, her duty to the child and any other negative connotations.<<
What difference does it make what kind of verbiage is used on this web-site? It is clear to all of us clear thinking men and fathers how we are to conduct ourselves in public and in court and we certainly do not neet some simpering "mommy" whiping our chins for us before we go into court where her first instinct is to bloody our noses in the eyes of the judge anyway.
"Avoid such words as..." Jesus Holy Christ! Now I have to worry that I might offend a feminazi on a father's rights (or should I say parent's rights website)?
And notice she insists that we refrain from usage of "her duty to the child" which she goes on to equate with a "negative connotation".
What rubbish spit up out of the old whittened sepulcher!
>>You should emphasize the best interest of the child.<<
Yes, yes, yes, we have learned how the feminist front manipulates the courts through devisive usage of verbiage: "The Best Interest of THe Child" ONLY WHEN IT APPLIES TO BENDING DAD OVER AND LETTING MOM STEAL HIS LIVELIHOOD AND HIS CHILDREN. What best interest of the child!
>>I am a breastfeeding mother with no objections to letting a dead beat dad have his day in court<<
Ah, wonderful, somehow her learning how to lay back and let the biological process of motherhood run it's course has been confused with justification of raping the father of her child in a court of law and refusing to acknowledge the basic rights of his part of the process she wants us to applaud her for enjoying.
PIG.
>>but I don?t agree with the bogus argument of breastfeeding and did not use it as an excuse.<<
You even bring it up (which you did) and it is the same as the evangilist who afer handling snakes, and being moved by the holy ghost now waves the crutches of the "faith-healed" child in our faces demaning our CONTRIBUTIONS.
In short, it is a confidence game. I breatfeed, therefore I provide, therefore I am good and worhty, so let's stone the "Dead-Beat".
With logic like that who needs lukemia.
>>If you really want to foster a good relationship with both parents<<
I'm sorry I forgot to observe the "Let's All Group Hug And Love One ANother" sign over the door. Unless I am mistaken, it is wrong to expect a battered woman to stay in a blindly abusive relationship, and likewise I think it is WRONG and NEGATIVE to insist that father's pretend to think fondly of the way we are beaten into the dirt by a system which is cold anc calcualting.
>>tell the guy to keep his dick in his pants<<
Sweety, one round in family law court with the likes of you and nobody has to tell dad nothing about keeping his dick in his trousers.
>>and his fists of the woman<<
See, I dind't even see anywhere where this woman even alleges to have been stricken by her man... did she, or am I blind?
No, rather she examplifies that EVEN THOUGH STATISITCS SPEAK TO MORE MEN BEING HOSPITALIZED AND KILLED IN DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CALLS (probalby because our society has accepted the emasculation of our men) all one has to do is suggest that a man has hit a woman and suddenly that wins the case and there goes the baby with the bath water.
P.T. BARNUM SAID IT BEST!
>>and for Christ?s sake<<
There it is... the Holy Ghost Spirit Money Shot.
>>love and adore the child, not foster the hate relationship.<<
LOVE prevails when BOTH parents participate equally in the life of their child or children. Statistiacally we have found irrefutably that it is detrimental to the best interest of any child and all parties involved to allow the mindless perpetuation of the current gender-bias which permates our so-called Family Law system.
Children need their fathers as much if not more now in this day and age than ever before.
Anyone who so glibly recommends the blame be put on the penis of the father needs to seriously consider raising their point of reasoning above the waist and stop the blame-game. Otherwise that's no mom at all.
I think it is WONDERUFUL when these snakes slither out from under their rocks to start spitting venom at the decent fathers they so despise.
It goes to show how their stupid arguments must fail and are beginning to fail with more and more frequency.
SHe states that this is not an apppropriate site for father to... whatever, but notice the self evident facts:
A. Feminazi's always go on and on about the brutalizing men and how we need to "communicate" rather than lashing out.
B. Men, Fathers and concerned women and mom's get togehter to share intelligent though on how to solve the problems rather than just whining about them and we get attacked.
C. Circular reasoning is used in courts and always loops back to the stupid blank stare of a mom or a lawyer on a mom's bahlf who just got done saying (not in so many words) she's the dad, he's the mom... give her what she wants becuase he is somehow to... naughty to get what he's asking for.
OF course they talk themselves in circles... they are so used to the formulaic man hating jargon that they don't even realize the half of them that they are using antiquated loopholes in a system the most of which nobody even traces back to their origin in some antiquated reasoning.
I hope you sent that to her. I might, just to make sure she gets it. :)