I understand you read and respond to many posts a day so I will be breif and try to give you the short story to jog the memory.
My name is Eric and I live in the state of New Hampshire. My wife filed for divorce and a domestic violence restrainging order that alleged I commited acts which are absolutely untrue.
At the final hearing, I presented evidence and witnesses to the fact that I had never abused my wife or children, but still a finding of abuse was made. My wife lied utterly in her testimony, implicating two people of helping or "advising her' to file the petitions, and that one of them witnessed the bruising on her body.
Now to the reason for this post. I have submitted a motion for reconsideration to the court. In my motion i asked the court to:
1. allow for new testimony to be entered that was unavailable and/or unknown at the time of the final hearing.
2.admit testimony from witnesses claimed by petitioner to have direct knowledge or participation in her allegations of domestic violence/
3.admit evidence from witness claimed by petitioner to have direct knowledge or participation in her allegations of domestic violence.
under the why should the court make these orders i stated
1. temporary restraining order issued by this court prevented me from contacting witnesses
2. One witness was unknown to me at the time of the fnal hearing, she stepped forward and offered testimony afterwards.
3. witness has proof petitioner deliberately lied under oath at the final hearing.
4 witness can give testimony that I had no prior knowledge of at the time of the final hearing.
5. All of the above witnesses and evidence was beyond any reasonable ability of myself or this court to collect at the time of final hearing.
Now here's the thing, above is exactly what is on my motion but after submitting it I started to wonder if I shouldn't have written it differently.
So my questions to you Soc are as follows:
1. Should I have named the witnesses, described the details of what they would be testifying to?
2. Should I have included a request for a new hearing in this motion or will the court order a new hearing if they grant my motion?
3. Should I amend the motion, since the clerk informed me it is my right to dod so?
4. If you were opposing this motion how would you object to it?
My wife's attorney is very good and I fully expect to recieve an objection to it so I would like to amend the motion before that occurs.
As before thank you in advance for your very helpful advise.
My name is Eric and I live in the state of New Hampshire. My wife filed for divorce and a domestic violence restrainging order that alleged I commited acts which are absolutely untrue.
At the final hearing, I presented evidence and witnesses to the fact that I had never abused my wife or children, but still a finding of abuse was made. My wife lied utterly in her testimony, implicating two people of helping or "advising her' to file the petitions, and that one of them witnessed the bruising on her body.
Now to the reason for this post. I have submitted a motion for reconsideration to the court. In my motion i asked the court to:
1. allow for new testimony to be entered that was unavailable and/or unknown at the time of the final hearing.
2.admit testimony from witnesses claimed by petitioner to have direct knowledge or participation in her allegations of domestic violence/
3.admit evidence from witness claimed by petitioner to have direct knowledge or participation in her allegations of domestic violence.
under the why should the court make these orders i stated
1. temporary restraining order issued by this court prevented me from contacting witnesses
2. One witness was unknown to me at the time of the fnal hearing, she stepped forward and offered testimony afterwards.
3. witness has proof petitioner deliberately lied under oath at the final hearing.
4 witness can give testimony that I had no prior knowledge of at the time of the final hearing.
5. All of the above witnesses and evidence was beyond any reasonable ability of myself or this court to collect at the time of final hearing.
Now here's the thing, above is exactly what is on my motion but after submitting it I started to wonder if I shouldn't have written it differently.
So my questions to you Soc are as follows:
1. Should I have named the witnesses, described the details of what they would be testifying to?
2. Should I have included a request for a new hearing in this motion or will the court order a new hearing if they grant my motion?
3. Should I amend the motion, since the clerk informed me it is my right to dod so?
4. If you were opposing this motion how would you object to it?
My wife's attorney is very good and I fully expect to recieve an objection to it so I would like to amend the motion before that occurs.
As before thank you in advance for your very helpful advise.