Messages

Hello.

1. Could you please tell me where I might locate the following document?: In Re Barnes, 264 B.R. 415 (Bkrtcy Mich 2001)

2.What do the letters "264" and "415" refer to?

3. What does "In Re" mean?

4. When one is trying to discredit case law, is the best approach to try and demonstrate the case law is not comparable to the present case (the facts and circumstances are not the same and to try and locae newer case law that contradicts the case law being presented?

5. Is newer usually better in case law as long as the circumstances/facts are similar?

Thank you.

...and you will see one of the reasons we are getting our buts kicked. Hundreds of Thousands of NOW (and related groups) members are protesting against abortion. I am not here to argue about abortion, but to make the point that these protestors are organized, articulate AND ARE WILLING TO MAKE A FEW PERSONAL SCARIFICES (like going to DC) to make their point known. The whole world is watching them and they are getting millions of dollars of free airtime. The best a children's rights leader can do is go on O'Reilly and get beat-up. WHAT YOU CAN DO:

Attend the Million Dads March on Father's Day:
http://www.milliondadsmarch.org/
You can stay in the DC KOA in an air-conditioned cabin that sleeps 4 for 50.00 a night.
I went last year.

Join this group:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/usafathers/
There are many men's groups, but this one is doing an extremely good job of networking with all the groups and pulling them together.

The laws are unjust. Unless we become politically active and make our presence known...we will continue to get stomped on. Do it for you kids...you want them to go through this kind of hell, too?

Please.

I definitely recommend NOT supporting United Way: their record of misandry is disgusting.


http://mensnewsdaily.com/archive/yz/z-misc/zeiger/2004/zeiger040904.htm

good thought. will pass it along

The following site contains the DADS of Michigan joint custody petition and related documents: it will unzip as a folder. Read the materials, print the petition as directed, and get some signatures, including your own. Registered voters, only. If you or your friends are not registed, get registered and sign the petition. This is a real chance to do something about this crap.

https://www.quickbase.com/up/9gsk8isf/g/rbi/ej/va/ChildrenNeedBothParentsPetiton13Mar04.zip

DADS OF MICHIGAN  will have a kick off meeting at the Royal Oak Post Office on Saturday, March 13 at 8:30 AM to distribute petions for A PRESUMPTION OF JOINT PHYSICAL CUSTODY INITIATiVE TO APPEAR ON NOV. BALLOT. The Post Office is located 1/2 block east of Main Street (Royal Oak) on 11 Mile Road.  You may take I-696 to Woodward Ave, head north (1 mile) to 11 Mile and head east. 

http://www.detnews.com/2004/metro/0403/12/d06-89688.htm

Anyone who is interested in reading the initiative, petition, and related info can email me and I will forward it to you.

 

Yes...I came across this a couple years ago. I do not know what became of it. I think the guy who filed the suit was a member of DADS of Michigan.

In criminal court money is used as a motive for crime consistently. The most recent example that comes to mind is the woman who stabbed her husband 193 times. The prosecutors argued successfully that her motive was her husband's 200,000.00 insurance policy.

In my case, my ex is a woman who is 37 years old and has made less than 20,000.00 in her life. She does not even have enough social security quarters to qualify for benefits. When this thing is over, I will have paid her close to 500,000.
That's not counting the 10 years I supported her without her working.

I am not excessively wealthy. I make about 90,000.00 a year and she gets about half at present. When I was with the FOC evaluator, I mentioned the fact about her lifetime income to him. I wanted him to consider the possibility that her motive was money.

 He did not take it that way: in his report he interpreted it to mean I was indicating she did not have the resources to take care of our daughter. I was  not direct with him.

I have no doubt that in my case her false allegations of domestic violence were motivated by the desire for money and advice from her feminist attorney. Since she has got her bucks, there has not been a peep out of her about DV or any adverse actions on my part towards our daughter. I have never been arrested or accused of any crime and have been a college teacher for 30 years, with an impeccable record
of achievement and no student complaints.

I fully expect her to make false allegations again in Jan. 06 when her alimony ends and the 3-year CS lock-in expires. At that time I will apply for a reduction of CS as per guidelines based on 50-50 custody as per decree. She will be destitute without my money.

1. Have you every heard of a family law attorney successfully DIRECTLY arguing that a mother's motivation for false abuse claims is motivated by money?

2. Since I believe that she will make false allegations in 06, how can I successfully document my fears and use them as a defense?

Looks good. Read his stuff.

I think July...do not know about the grandfather stuff....FOC does its best to keep everyone in the dark.