>The burden is on you to prove that it's in the child(ren)'s
>best interest for you to have more parenting time.
>The big issue is the ex's disability. If she's too disabled to
>work, then the question is how can she raise the kids,
>effectively. That would be your best argument. You could still
>lose -- depends on the nature of the disability and how it may
>affect the kids.
This is what I figured. To my mind it is a no brainer that it is in the kids' best interest to be with both parents equally, but I know that won't fly in a courtroom.
All I really have right now is that the kids need to be with their Dad more often because they do; they all miss an extraordinary amount of school each year (more than 15 days last semester and have only been to school 2 of the 5 school days so far this year) and I would ensure they attend school regularly. I also have some flimsy evidence of parental alienation and that Mom has actively tried to prevent a relationship with me while I would (and do) act to ensure they maintain a solid relationship with her. Not much to work with, huh?
1. What arguments would the court entertain (just as examples) to show an increase in parenting time is the best thing for them?
2. Is there any way (short of depositions/discovery before a trial) to find out what Mom's disability is if she refuses to tell me? Could my lawyer ask her and expect an answer or is this considered confidential information?
3. I want to keep the kids out of the fight as much as I can. They all know my intentions (50/50) and are excited by the idea and have said they look forward to living with me half the time. Can I get their input submitted as part of the case without having to call them into court (which I will not do as that is most certainly NOT in their best interests)? Or can I disregard their input and protest if Mom tries to call them into court? I am sure that what they would have to say would be favorable for me, but I do not want to put them throught that kind of stress.
Thanks!
Always,
My Kids' Dad