>>1 - Father is seeking Joint Custody (at the least), in your
>>opinion, does he have a good chance at receiving this based
>on
>>the situation?
>
>Under the unusual facts you post, I would say that father has
>a better chance at SOLE custody than at Joint, because by
>advocating joint, you are impliedly agreeing that the mother
>is not that bad an influence on the child. Your facts suggest
>that the mother is seriously mentally disturbed and that she
>is causing the child emotional abuse.
>
>If it were my case, I would have a psychiatrist all over this
>woman and I would be taking it all the way to the mat for sole
>custody.
>
----Father plans to request psch evaluations for mother, himself and child. He had been advocating for joint custody at the last hearing. However, since the recent occurences wants to try for sole custody. However, he has some concerns on how that will go. Child is 5 years old and since mother and father split in dec. 2004, has predominantly resided with mother. However, these circumstances only occurred because after father moved out (and paid the mortgage for 1.5 years without living there) mother began dictating to father when he could and could not see child; as well as refusing overnight visitations. Child has started overnight visitations and will have had 2 months of EOW overnights as well as a weekday schedule of tuesday and thursday evenings which have been in effect for 6 months now. Father is nervous that court may not grant sole custody because child has resided with mother so much more. Child experiences few problems while in father's care. The most recent were outlined, others include child becoming upset with father in past for mentionaing overnights because child claims "I would be away from my mom for 3 whole days" (child has no concept of time...obviously something mother has said) "My mom would be sad without me" a comment more than one person has heard mother saying to child in the past week.
1- Do you think the fact that the mother has had child more will effect the decision, despite her actions?
2- Do you think the court would take into consideration the fact that father did not have as much time as mother because mother prohibited it?
As for question two. I know that father could have taken legal action sooner, but was trying to do what was best for child. The separation was upsetting enough, did not want to cause any further harm--already knew mother's reactions and opinions on child being with father equally.
>>opinion, does he have a good chance at receiving this based
>on
>>the situation?
>
>Under the unusual facts you post, I would say that father has
>a better chance at SOLE custody than at Joint, because by
>advocating joint, you are impliedly agreeing that the mother
>is not that bad an influence on the child. Your facts suggest
>that the mother is seriously mentally disturbed and that she
>is causing the child emotional abuse.
>
>If it were my case, I would have a psychiatrist all over this
>woman and I would be taking it all the way to the mat for sole
>custody.
>
----Father plans to request psch evaluations for mother, himself and child. He had been advocating for joint custody at the last hearing. However, since the recent occurences wants to try for sole custody. However, he has some concerns on how that will go. Child is 5 years old and since mother and father split in dec. 2004, has predominantly resided with mother. However, these circumstances only occurred because after father moved out (and paid the mortgage for 1.5 years without living there) mother began dictating to father when he could and could not see child; as well as refusing overnight visitations. Child has started overnight visitations and will have had 2 months of EOW overnights as well as a weekday schedule of tuesday and thursday evenings which have been in effect for 6 months now. Father is nervous that court may not grant sole custody because child has resided with mother so much more. Child experiences few problems while in father's care. The most recent were outlined, others include child becoming upset with father in past for mentionaing overnights because child claims "I would be away from my mom for 3 whole days" (child has no concept of time...obviously something mother has said) "My mom would be sad without me" a comment more than one person has heard mother saying to child in the past week.
1- Do you think the fact that the mother has had child more will effect the decision, despite her actions?
2- Do you think the court would take into consideration the fact that father did not have as much time as mother because mother prohibited it?
As for question two. I know that father could have taken legal action sooner, but was trying to do what was best for child. The separation was upsetting enough, did not want to cause any further harm--already knew mother's reactions and opinions on child being with father equally.