>>Thanks for the answer:
>>I have both 50% physical and legal custody. Juristiction is
>>in my home city. I like this forum. There is alot of good
>>info here. thanks again
>>
>>Shawn
>
>That's a very odd arrangement - that you have 50% physical
>custody but live in different cities - especially for a child
>so young. Ignoring what the agreement says, how many nights a
>year is the child with you?
>
>That increases your chances, but you STILL have to convince
>the court that it's in the child's best interest to change
>custody. The plus is that once the kid starts school, it will
>have to switch to one parent primary, anyway. The minus is
>that it will have to switch to one parent primary - and if she
>has more nights than you, it works in her favor.
I understand that even if both parties have 50 legal and physical sometimes the court designates one parent as the primary residence. Hopefully they will either not do this or give me the title of primary residence. If they givew it to her does that mean she is more favorable when it comes to deciding full custody?
>>I have both 50% physical and legal custody. Juristiction is
>>in my home city. I like this forum. There is alot of good
>>info here. thanks again
>>
>>Shawn
>
>That's a very odd arrangement - that you have 50% physical
>custody but live in different cities - especially for a child
>so young. Ignoring what the agreement says, how many nights a
>year is the child with you?
>
>That increases your chances, but you STILL have to convince
>the court that it's in the child's best interest to change
>custody. The plus is that once the kid starts school, it will
>have to switch to one parent primary, anyway. The minus is
>that it will have to switch to one parent primary - and if she
>has more nights than you, it works in her favor.
I understand that even if both parties have 50 legal and physical sometimes the court designates one parent as the primary residence. Hopefully they will either not do this or give me the title of primary residence. If they givew it to her does that mean she is more favorable when it comes to deciding full custody?