The entire thing is very iffy. Here is how my case is working out:
My ex could have asked our son's new "home state" to take jurisdiction. She did not so it looks like Georgia will retain jurisdiction. IT IS UP TO THE JUDGE to decide. According the the UCCJA the judge can look at if one parent has remained in the original state. Also, in my case all evidence is here in Georgia. Finally, my lawyer cited a case where Georgia gave up jurisdiction, but was ordered to retain jurisdiction because the father never moved out of state and had "significant" ties to the state (Fish V. Fish).
Anyway, we are still messing with lawyers right now. This is very difficult.
My ex could have asked our son's new "home state" to take jurisdiction. She did not so it looks like Georgia will retain jurisdiction. IT IS UP TO THE JUDGE to decide. According the the UCCJA the judge can look at if one parent has remained in the original state. Also, in my case all evidence is here in Georgia. Finally, my lawyer cited a case where Georgia gave up jurisdiction, but was ordered to retain jurisdiction because the father never moved out of state and had "significant" ties to the state (Fish V. Fish).
Anyway, we are still messing with lawyers right now. This is very difficult.