Okay, unfortunately the daycare arguement is not applicable because she is planning to be a stay at home mom. She has a lot in savings and her living expenses are very low. Between the CS she will get from me and her savings, she will be able to stay home with the child for at least 2 years. She's very insistant she feels this is best for the child. She's not saying "I can't have overnight visits or extended visits" she's saying no one can or should for at least 2 years.
We both come from broken homes. I was old enough when my parents seperated to remember all the fighting and was relieved when it stopped. She doesn't remember the fighting and remembers what a pain in the ass it was to change residence every week.
The problem is we are both stating our points with no real knowledge of what is best for the child. We're flying blind (I know, welcome to the club), and I just figure there has got to be some research out there that supports what one of us is saying. Otherwise, we may never come to an agreement. I don't want the courts to decide what my role as a father should and will be. I'd like to decide ourselves and just file it with the courts. I am just stuggling to find sources that will support my arguement.
Does that make sense?
We both come from broken homes. I was old enough when my parents seperated to remember all the fighting and was relieved when it stopped. She doesn't remember the fighting and remembers what a pain in the ass it was to change residence every week.
The problem is we are both stating our points with no real knowledge of what is best for the child. We're flying blind (I know, welcome to the club), and I just figure there has got to be some research out there that supports what one of us is saying. Otherwise, we may never come to an agreement. I don't want the courts to decide what my role as a father should and will be. I'd like to decide ourselves and just file it with the courts. I am just stuggling to find sources that will support my arguement.
Does that make sense?