Messages

filed with a court date and it specifically says no kids.

filed. her lawyer filed them and had him served.

the problem though is she says she DOES want the child, but doesn't do anything about it, and when we talked to her, SHE admitted she asked specifically for those papers. i don't want to get into any legal trouble, and we did speak to both lawyers, ours says the same as you, hers says she requested them, she says she doesn't want to change them, but she DOES want to take the child. i'm so confused!

this whole thing seems like some bad trap or some horrible nightmare and her lawyer has no clue what he's doing! our lawyer is speaking to her's on monday.

the lawyer already knows about the move, that was what spurred the whole thing, and we let the lawyer know about it, and he said he understands there are children, thats how the mother wanted to file, so i'm confused to her motivations right now. we have been taking pictures and getting what records we can, but as he's 2, he hasn't had any schooling, but all of his medical records have the dads name on them. and i mean all, even when she had him, she refused to take him to the doctors office, or when she did, she'd sit outside and wait until they were done leaving the dad with my step son.

and we do also have every text/email and even facebook messages of her threatening physical violence against the father, saying she has hit him before and she is prepared and willing to do it again 'because i hate him so much' (in her owns words) and we have that all as screen captures. she does refuse to give him the birth certificate and we are currently dealing with the state to get a new one, he filed and paid, they claimed they never got the money or request.

and i'm confused as well as to exactly what it is. it STARTED because of the letter stating the father had intentions to move, and yet all she talks about is the divorce, not really getting her son back. she's mentioned it a few times, but 9 out of 10 times she talks about the divorce so she can go marry her newest boyfriend.

or, i suppose rather he is the one sending the filing in.

she does have a lawyer, which is why i'm confused. shouldn't he have given her the correct papers as HE is the one filing? something just doesn't seem right.

currently there are no records or court orders of who gets him, and there are medical records of him living with his father, as of april first, he will have been with him for 6 months straight, but the records do indicate that even she was seeing her son on a normal basis, she did not take him to the doctors for the numerous health issues he was having. he is currently to young to be in school,  so there is no records for that. no neglect charges as of yet, but we have proof of her not feeding him, up to and including medical documentation of this 2 year old loosing weight and his medical coverage lapsing while in her care. she blamed the weight on him running around and playing, yet he runs around and plays with us all day long and has done nothing but gain weight since we have taken full custody of the child.

the father does want to move to Texas, as he has family out there who want to take care of him, and has gotten 4 job offers pending his move. when we told the mother of this, she freaked out, and filed to have the divorce, but filed it as the heading says, stating it is without children, which is what we don't understand. he knows to read the divorce papers first, and if it says he is not allowed to move, he is going to fight that, but because she filed it w/o children, we are not expecting that.

what should the father do, in this case, for the best interest of the child and himself?

What exactly does that mean? the divorce has been filed claiming no minor children?

my boyfriend's ex wife has filed that, trying to take custody of their son. i was under the impression that when that is filed, once the divorce is completely done, that because she claimed there were no children involved, she is claiming she doesn't want her son back, and that if thats the case, she wont be able to, or at least it's going to be very very difficult for her to attempt to re-open a custody battle. is this true?

this is all happening in kansas, by the way.