I guess I'm surprised that the fact that I changed which state has jurisdiction and the fact that I moved away from NM are seen in a seemingly negative light. No one has said anything directly negative about these decisions, but there does seem to be an implication that I was "state shopping" and being a "moveaway" parent. The UCCJEA does help parents change the state of jurisdiction in certain circumstances and one of those is specifically when most of the evidence about a child's care is no longer in the original state. My daughter had not lived in NM since 2011 and I had not lived there since 2009. I don't believe that by taking advantage of that fact in order to file a motion closer to my home is wrong. My ex and I had been having a dispute for a month, and I chose to file before he did. He had been threatening to do so and didn't. When he did finally file, the state of NM declared they were declining jurisdiction. It doesn't make sense to say that the law doesn't support what I did.
As far as being a move away parent, I didn't take my daughter with me when I left. My ex was not victimized in anyway. When she decided to move in with me, it was because he wasn't taking care of her and his other children well. If he had wanted to fight her leaving NM, he could have and would have probably won.
Thank you for the advice on the Christmas visit which is truly appreciated.
As far as being a move away parent, I didn't take my daughter with me when I left. My ex was not victimized in anyway. When she decided to move in with me, it was because he wasn't taking care of her and his other children well. If he had wanted to fight her leaving NM, he could have and would have probably won.
Thank you for the advice on the Christmas visit which is truly appreciated.