Messages

I did not find out about this happening until Sat 10-29-05 about the choking incident, it happened on Fri. 10-28-05. As far as the daycare not thinking it is a big deal, does not surprise me, as they tend to scream at kids also. Also the way that I found out about it is the BM called me and told me what happened, and what she did.

So you are saying that a notorized statement of what happened by the daycare director that witnessed it will do me no good??

As far as why I have not contacted CPS is that I do not want to lose my kids alltogether.. Plus I am not trying to remove thier mother from thier lives, just do not think that they are being taken care of as good as they could be in her care..
I just want my kids to be SAFE and HEALTHY..

How much more do I need to gain custody of my kids, before they are totally screwed up?
Background, we all live in Texas; Have joint managerial custody with BM having domicile.
The BM has stated she wants to give me custody several times," have tapings of her saying so. I have had the papers drawn up, but after doing so she has changed her mind.
Fast Fore ward>>
Over the last three weeks my daughter has gotten in trouble at daycare, first time she bit a kid because the other kid had something she wanted that was on 11-21-05, last Friday she chocked a child and left marks on her neck...
BM picks daughter up at daycare and finds out what had happened, so BM proceeds to grab my daughter by the throat and choke her and asks her how it feels to have it done to her??
I have spoken to the daycare director, which whom it was done it front of, and she said she would write up a statement of what happened in front of her for me.

1.)   Could the actions of BM be considered child abuse??
2.)   Does that constitute grounds enough for change in custody??


P.S. I have other documented facts of things of this nature that she has done...
If need be I can post a lot more things, and facts for you to give a more thorough analysis.

Hello,

Some background if first, I live in Texas and have been divorced for  almost four years now.. I am the NCP, my xpbfh does not know how to, or is too lazy to discipline our 4,& 6 yo kids, and has a verry nasty temper with me, as much as I try to get along with her for the kids sake nothing seems to work unless it is something to benifit her, anyway I am getting off track here. My question is my ex a couple of months ago told me that if I think i can do a better job of raising our kids to have my lawyer draw up the papers, and she would sing mnaging custody of our kids over to me, basically switch rights that each of us have right now, so i had them drawn up and now she has refused to sign them.. Here is the point of the question, I have all of this on recording, as I tape record all contact with her via over the phone or face to face..
Do I, or would I have enough to take her to court to force the order, I have the on recording on three or four different encounters of contact with her saying the same thing every time..

From a dad that has and is still going thru the same thing. Let me give you some insight on what I have done, my pbfh ex would not put me on my sons papers for school, well I took  it upon my self to contact the school and add my self to the contacts and what ever else that asked for my info, granted i have joint managing custody, with her having domicile.. Any who I just had to take it upon myself to make sure that my name and info go onto the forms and to the school etc.. myself, and not rely on her to do it, plus I aslo found out the teachers e-mail addy, and conference times, I started by e-mailing the teacher, and introducing myself, and briefly explaining the situation to her, then followed up with her by calling her during her conference time and talking to her about the situation..
Hope this helps out some...

ASSEMBLY, No. 1327


STATE OF NEW JERSEY

212th LEGISLATURE

 

PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2006 SESSION

 



 

Sponsored by:

Assemblyman PETER J. BIONDI

District 16 (Morris and Somerset)

 

 

 

 

SYNOPSIS

     Makes certain operators of interactive computer services and Internet service providers liable to persons injured by false or defamatory messages posted on public forum websites.

 

CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT

     As introduced.

   



An Act concerning the posting of certain Internet messages and supplementing chapter 38A of Title 2A of the New Jersey Statutes.

 

     Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

 

     1.  As used in this act:

     "Information content provider" means any person or entity that is responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of information provided through the Internet or any other interactive computer service.

     "Interactive computer service" means any information system, service, or access software provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server, including specifically a service or system that provides service to the Internet.

     "Internet" means the international computer network of both federal and non-federal interoperable packet switched data networks.

     "Internet service provider" or "provider" means any person, business or organization qualified to do business in this State that provides individuals, corporations, or other entities with the ability to connect to the Internet through equipment that is located in this State.

     "Operator" means any person, business or organization qualified to do business in this State that operates an interactive computer service.

 

     2.  The operator of any interactive computer service or an Internet service provider shall establish, maintain and enforce a policy to require any information content provider who posts written messages on a public forum website either to be identified by a legal name and address, or to register a legal name and address with the operator of the interactive computer service or the Internet service provider through which the information content provider gains access to the interactive computer service or Internet, as appropriate.

 

     3.  An operator of an interactive computer service or an Internet service provider shall establish and maintain reasonable procedures to enable any person to request and obtain disclosure of the legal name and address of an information content provider who posts false or defamatory information about the person on a public forum website.

 

     4.  Any person who is damaged by false or defamatory written messages that originate from an information content provider who posts such messages on a public forum website may file suit in Superior Court against an operator or provider that fails to establish, maintain and enforce the policy required pursuant to section 2 of P.L.    , c.    (C.) (pending before the Legislature as this bill), and may recover compensatory and punitive damages and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee, cost of investigation and litigation from such operator or provider.

 

     5. This act shall take effect on the 90th day following enactment.

 

 

STATEMENT

 

     This bill would require an operator of any interactive computer service or an Internet service provider to establish, maintain and enforce a policy requiring an information content provider who posts messages on a public forum website either to be identified by legal name and address or to register a legal name and address with the operator or provider prior to posting messages on a public forum website.

     The bill requires an operator of an interactive computer service or an Internet service provider to establish and maintain reasonable procedures to enable any person to request and obtain disclosure of the legal name and address of an information content provider who posts false or defamatory information about the person on a public forum website.

     In addition, the bill makes any operator or Internet service provider liable for compensatory and punitive damages as well as costs of a law suit filed by a person damaged by the posting of such messages if the operator or Internet service provider fails to establish, maintain and enforce the policy required by section 2 of the bill.




DUH, I'm not so dumb, I've been practicing!!!!

That is exactly what I do, is buy my kids clothes for when they are at my house. When I pick them up the first thing I do is change them into the clothes that I bought them, and wash the ones that they came in, and put them back in those clothes to got back home.

Yes I am using it, and it is becoming a handy and very resourceful tool..
So far i am very pleased with the purchase of it.

>Okay.  We have decided to do it and go back.  We need to find
>out who boyfriend is.  My ss bm said her bf name but thats it.
> I looked on public computers downtown and their are a bunch
>of people with same name.  We know nothing about him.  I got
>his license plate, so here's the question how can we get his
>information from his plate?  How can we get it ran to find out
>who he is?  Thanks for all the help.  Time is important if
>anyone can help me.
>
>Thanks


PM me and i will help you out..


DUH, I'm not so dumb, I've been practicing!!!!