Messages

Recap-BM filed to have interest added to arrears, compounded annually for the past 10 years.
Court was today.

It went nowhere;she got nothing.

Oh wait, she did manage to make the DA a tad bit upset because of not being completely honest (to say the least) in her filings.

Thanks for all your help, again!

and to quote our attorney today, after meeting with her for an hour.....
"she's toast!"


If you care to know the reasons why ( little different than what has been discussed here) please let me know if I can email you as the BM in this case reads here :)

Ms. Green(e) is also handling our case in NV.
So far, she's been pretty helpful though.....

okay, I can't afford that but you're welcome in Vegas any time!

This is baffling/confusing...
the hearing in December, as quoted by the notice, is to review before the "Child Support Hearing Master", the NRS...that standing for "Nevada Revised Statutes", (there's 5 listed).

1) Now, if CA controls the order, which it does and is stated in the last stipulation agreement (April 05, signed by judge), do any of these Nevada statutes even apply?
The one listed for this hearing on the pubic online court information is NRS 425--which, briefly, is to determine if the CP is on public aid. (there's other things in there about determining parentage...).

*The complete audit, sent to all parties, including Nevada court, has the whole support payments broken up into "On Aid/Off Aid audit" and the full one with both.....

if you would be so kind :)

Would asking for attorneys fees be appropriate? In light of the false information, etc....?

Found an attorney that has stated pretty much what you have here--thanks so much, btw, for all your guidance!

Lady attorney--she's appalled that BM is trying to do this especially when the current order will be ending soon and BF has been paying consistantly. Mentioned that a judge will see right through this obvious attempt to keep BF is servitude---my kinda gal!


Thanks again and will let you know what happens come December~

if you would be so kind :)

Would asking for attorneys fees be appropriate? In light of the false information, etc....?

Found an attorney that has stated pretty much what you have here--thanks so much, btw, for all your guidance!

Lady attorney--she's appalled that BM is trying to do this especially when the current order will be ending soon and BF has been paying consistantly. Mentioned that a judge will see right through this obvious attempt to keep BF is servitude---my kinda gal!


Thanks again and will let you know what happens come December~

based on more information.

BM just went through a support modification in CA regarding a different BF. I believe this was in May 2005.
BM was at the hearing and interest was added for this BF and NOT compounded, of course.
So, prior to BM filing for compounded interest (June 05), she had been through the court process (May 05) with another BF.
CA controls both orders.

1) Does this info shed any "light" on what has been previously discussed? ie, show her knowledge of the whole interest question before she filed?

2) Just something nagging here---the OR printout shows NO payments received for the entire year of 2003 and that was used to compound the interest figures. BM knows payments were received during that year and has mentioned amounts paid during that year, several times.
(yes, written proof)
She knew CA was receiving payments (written proof again).
Obvious fraud?

Point understood.
thanks again~