Has anyone heard of this? Is this a real thing? I read this today, I think the person who wrote this may be misinformed..
"There is a caveat with the child visitations that is implied, but not written. Because moving back and forth between homes can be very stressful for a young child it is suggested that the child stay at one residence until the age of 3. After which the child can stay at the non-custodial parent’s house. Check out the “Standard Possession Order.”
You’ll have to get that written into the papers, a judge is very unlikely to say no to grant that."
So what's more stressful to a child..
1. Knowing and having a relationship with both parents from birth, or
2. Spending the night with a complete stranger at the age of three.
Is this made up? or is this accurate? I thought a standard possession order was like a parenting agreement. I hate the word "possession" when referring to a child. Personally, I would use "blessing".