>Thanks Soc. One other thing though...
>
>1. Does it matter at all if I can prove, I mean seriously
>prove, that somebody or some people lied in court? Or are you
>saying that the findings are final, and that I can only agrue
>how those findings were used with regard to the law, not the
>findings themselves? (I understand the discretion thing, I
>think, e.g. sexism in this case, ugh.)
If someone materially falsifies testimony, AND "but for" the material falsification the court would have ruled differently, then you can move to set aside the trial court judgment. Furthermore, you must show that the evidence of the lie could not have been exposed through diligent use of the standard discovery process during the course of litigation, i.e., the evidence, must not have been reasonably knowable until after final judgment was entered.
This is not an appeal. You are moving to set aside on grounds that a fraud against the court has been purpetrated.
