>The exact text reads
>
>The Husband shall pick up "name of child" each weekday after
>school including early dismissal and return to paternal
>grandmother at 6:00 pm the same day.
>
>However once my son and his mother moved I was not picking him
>up everyday-so when we went back to court recently she made a
>proposal that the order read Pick up every other weekend-with
>drop off of 6:00--however this has not been signed off on by
>any judge yet-it is a proposed order--the signature on bottom
>of page is blank where judge should sign- there for this
>should not be active-first order should over-ride that . I
>only was picking him up this one day because it was his B-day
>so I took off work early,and she knew that.
>
>They were confused between the 2 orders and went with being
>safe and listened to her- She knew this order was not in
>effect yet.
Seems like you have a case against the other parent for "uttering," which is the act of purporting a document to be something other than it actually is, and acase against the government for a civil rights violation.
However, if the judge signs that order, then your case will be moot. So, the issue becomes, how likely is it that the judge will sign this order? Are you just positioning yourself to try to thread a temporary needle, or is there no reasonable likelihood that the judge will enter this proposed order? Is the order before the judge right now, and he/she just hasn't signed it but intends to do so? Are there other reasons why you would likely be denied your current custody rights in favor of a more restrictive order?
I can't answer these questions, but you can.