>My personal opinion is "True and Equal Parenting" from the
>start. Take away the incentive and more marriages would remain
>intact. Give BOTH FIT parents total equality in the courtroom
>and many women would opt to stay and work things out. Barring
>any abuse or neglect that may be going on. Not false
>allegations, the use of solid evidence.
>
>It would be a step in the right direction and remove much of
>the conflicts many now face.
>
>The children would come out the true winners.
>
>But right now, things are too easy to walk away, too many
>incentives and the knowledge of how to play the game. Whether
>it is an RO or OOP or being encouraged to keep a 'high
>conflict' situation going, and beleive me, CP's are told to do
>this just so there will not be "joint". On most of their
>sites, this is one of the first things you will read.
>
>Here is Liz Scott's advice to women:
>
> newbielink:http://www.realfamilylaw.com/tutorial-for-women-on-effective-use-of-dv-allegations.php [nonactive]
>
>And more on Liz:
>
> newbielink:http://www.gate.net/~liz/liz/ [nonactive]
>
>The "NEW" game in town:
>
> newbielink:http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/roberts/060222 [nonactive]
>
> newbielink:http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/roberts/060228 [nonactive]
>
>The sad part is, there are many step parents who really love
>and care about these children caught in the middle. Many of
>them would never dream of pulling this crap. And CP's who
>truely put their children as top priority. To them, I salute
>you.
>
>Here is someone who is standing his ground and doing something
>politically toward REAL reform,
>
> newbielink:http://www.equalcustodyact.com/ [nonactive]
>
>
>
>
>
You're mixing up two different people. Lisa Scott is a lawyer with an appraently strange sense of humor. I really think she's for equal rights, but is trying to demonstrate it through satire. Liz Kates is a lawyer from Florida who has posted many articles that are derogatory towards fathers rights.