On your note that final orders replace all prior orders...

[DecentDad]

Soc,

Thanks very much for your replies on my issue.  Will ponder and decide.

You mentioned to another poster that final orders wholly replace all other orders unless final orders contain a clause like "all other orders remain in effect."

I just want to confirm that.

E.g., if 2003 orders state that my ex and I can record each other without need for consent, and if 2004 final orders (per Montenegro) doesn't mention it nor mention that prior orders remain in force, then that 2003 order is no longer in force?

Thanks,
DD

[socrateaser]

>E.g., if 2003 orders state that my ex and I can record each
>other without need for consent, and if 2004 final orders (per
>Montenegro) doesn't mention it nor mention that prior orders
>remain in force, then that 2003 order is no longer in force?

If an order is styled as "temporary," then it expires automatically upon entry of final judgment, absent express orders in the judgment or temporary orders extending the effect of the temporary orders.

I can't give you specifics re your 2003 orders without reading them, but I'm sure you can figure it out.

[DecentDad]

.