Welcome to SPARC Forums. Please login or sign up.

Nov 24, 2024, 08:27:09 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Noted Tax Historian´s Book....

Started by MYSONSDAD, Oct 19, 2004, 10:51:59 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

MYSONSDAD

An assistant attorney general and a noted legal specialist acknowlege that
the income tax system is based on fraud. And the below story was reported on
FINDLAW, a heavily-used MAINSTREAM legal resource website. Is our message
finally going mainstream? This could be the HUGE.

This article can be found at:

http://news.corporate.findlaw.com/prnewswire/20040930/30sep2004142057.html

Of course this guy is only saying what Irwin's said all along.

Noted Tax Historian´s Book Declares U.S. Income Tax as Direct Tax is in
Violation of Long-established U.S. Supreme Court Mandates
TALLAHASSEE, Fla., Sep. 30 /PRNewswire/ --

TALLAHASSEE, Fla., Sept. 30 /PRNewswire/ -- John Garrison, prominent tax law
historian and legal specialist at Florida's Office of the Attorney General,
today announced that the income tax is being erroneously enforced on
employees as a direct tax rather than as the excise mandated by the
Sixteenth Constitutional Amendment. The current enforcement as a direct tax
is costing working Americans thousands of improperly collected tax dollars
over the course of their lifetime. Garrison is currently writing about his
findings in his book "The New Income Tax Scandal" which he is co-authoring
with Brian Stabley, J.D., an Assistant Attorney General at Florida's Office
of the Attorney General.

"'The New Income Tax Scandal' is about the corruption that lies at the heart
of the tax system," said Garrison. "As a result of my legal case against the
IRS in 2000, the IRS now privately concedes that, in 1915, after the
ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the
case of Brushaber v. Union Pacific that an income tax is an excise tax, and
that it is to be enforced as such. An excise is not a direct tax on
property, but an indirect tax. The critical difference is that a collection
of income tax as an excise allows for the deduction of all living expenses
since they are seen as necessary for the maintenance and conservation of
one's income producing property, one's labor. With a direct tax, this is not
possible. Given this, it appears that up to my legal case, the IRS had been
operating as if it had no awareness of the Sixteenth Amendment's intent.
Clearly, this revelation has enormous political and economic implications
for every American employee and it is my hope that my book will compel
policy makers to right this obvious injury to American workers."

John Garrison has been engaged in tax law research and tax reform activism
for over two decades. He currently serves as a legal specialist at Florida's
Office of the Attorney General, Bureau of Administrative Law.

Brian Stabley is an Assistant Attorney General at Florida's Office of the
Attorney General, Bureau of Administrative Law.

This release was issued on behalf of the above organization by
Send2Press(TM), a unit of Neotrope(R). http://www.send2press.com/

John C. Garrison
CONTACT: John C. Garrison, +1-850-414-3706, [email protected]

Web site: http://www.send2press.com/