Welcome to SPARC Forums. Please login or sign up.

Nov 24, 2024, 02:08:09 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Jurisdiction Fight After Three Year Court Battle

Started by Listless.Soul, Oct 28, 2011, 09:55:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Listless.Soul


I was divorced in 2005 in PA and in the settlement agreement, I unknowingly agreed that she may relocate to Florida and that Florida would be considered the home state.  I had no contact with my ex-wife and daughter for two years despite attempting to locate them and subsequently filed a motion in PA for contempt.

In 2001,jurisdiction was transferred to Florida and it was litigated for three solid years and subsequently, I was awarded sole legal and physical custody of my daughter almost two years ago. During that time, ex-wife has attempted to re-litigate the case and filed many, many motions that have not been sent for hearing and an appeal which was voluntarily withdrawn several days ago.  One motion was to have the judge recuse himself based on fabricated and imagined biases.

Additionally, she filed a motion in PA prior to her withdrawal of her appeal, where the child and I reside since I was awarded custody, to transfer custody back to her again based upon some imagined occurrences and grounds which hold no water.

The custody order in Florida states that it will retain jurisdiction on custodial matters and child support.  Again, there are motions that she filed including a child support and contempt order and my motion to terminate contact until she obtains a psychologic evaluation, that have not been sent for hearing open in Florida.  The child has resided in PA for two years since the order but again, the case was litigated for three years and several expert witnesses in Florida.

My PA attorney filed a motion to dismiss based upon the fact that the appeal was pending, there are open motions in Florida and that we have litigated this case to death and nothing has changed.  The judge is holding a hearing on the motion to dismiss next week and stated unequivocally that BOTH PARTIES APPEAR IN PERSON and that she will need to explain the circumstances surrounding her pending appeal (which was since retracted/voluntarily dismissed.)

Is there a chance that this case would need to start all over from scratch in PA disregarding all of the time and expense that it was litigated in Florida?

Under what circumstances would the Florida judge relinquish jurisdiction or rather, would anyone believe it be in anyone's best interest to transfer jurisdiction?

Lastly, we were awarded nearly $20,000 in attorney's fees based upon the fact that she drew out litigation whenever, wherever possibly, we do not expect to see a dime of that money however, knowing that she can and will litigate us to death, is it possible to stop her from litigating so much by say, an injunction or bar?

Spaceman1982

MOst states like to keep their jurisdiction. Im confused though.....so Folrida did or didn't relenquish jrisdicition??


Listless.Soul

There is a motion pending in Florida that she filed to ask for jurisdiction to be relinquished and there has yet to be a hearing on it.

The Florida Judge seems to have gotten to know the ex-wife and her antics and I don't want to have to start all over again.  We can hope FL maintains jurisdiction as we can not afford another $60,000 in legal fees!

ocean

Do you think she will fly up for the PA hearing?
Your lawyer should have all the paperwork to prove the Fla cases and it should be dropped. "Usually" the home state of the child takes over after 6 or more months of living there BUT if you have a Fla order stating they will keep it then it should stay there. Usually it is the custodial parent asking for the transfer. Find it funny that she is asking to move it out of her state. (but if judge does not like her....).

Practice no contact except what is in the court order. Answer with one liners. Read some other posts for good ideas on dealing with an ex like this.

Listless.Soul

After my post, just got info that she filed a stay of the hearing and/or a request for a telephonic appearance despite the judge specifically saying both parties must appear in person.  Hearing is next week, we will see what transpires.  I am anxious to simply move on, as is my child. 

Thanks for the reply,