Soc, I'm about to fall over dead of dumbness.

[Nugo]

Soc,
     I don't get it.  Here's the summary; Findings came out, had to appeal to Supreme Court within 30 days of that.  Did that.  While Supreme Court and I polish the details to get the case prepared, the Family Court re-opens the case and calls my Motion To Reconsider/Modify (which I sent in but never expected a lick of attention to be paid to it) a Motion To Modify (custody).
     One would think this is good.  Not only am I getting my legal right to file an appeal to the Supreme Court, but the very Family Court that took my child away is, all of a sudden, breaking out the gavel and doing a little stutterstep, juke move.
     Here's the order of events.
A.  I lose custody after final divorce hearing
B.  Nothing much happens for a while
C.  I file a Motion To Reconsider/Modify based on NEW evidence and file my Pro Se declaration.
D.  Motion gets ignored, wasn't filed on proper forms on a count of a hurricane.
E.  Filed it again, on proper forms, expecting same rejection.
F.  Findings are published.
F.  Family Court Judge accepts my 2nd Motion.
G. Family Court Judge denied opposing counsel's objection to the motion.
H. Opposing counsel and defendant file their defense, I counter it with my own fine Hail Mary.
I.  Family Court Judge is going to decide (blank) on (blank) date.
J.  Meanwhile, back at the Supreme Court, I get approved for In Forma Pauperis but denied State Payment for transcripts ($500.00).
K.  Supreme court says file all stuff, from docketing statement on down, by Jan. 2nd or the floor might drop out, and the case may be scrapped.


Oh, My Flickin God.  

1.  What does this MEAN?

[socrateaser]

probably, when the trial court saw you appealled, it got a call from the appellate court judge, saying something like, "rehear this guy's case, so we don't have to, ok?"

[Nugo]

none