Welcome to SPARC Forums. Please login or sign up.

Nov 27, 2024, 02:34:04 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Proof read of a proposed order

Started by mudbunnies, Nov 25, 2003, 04:00:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

mudbunnies

morning Soc

i posted this on the old board but couldn't get back to it so see if you replied so if this is duplicate work for u my most sincere apologies.

background;

child support case & family case now in same county, father files to consolidate, judge grants, below is the proposed order;


In the matter of;      Case No. xxxxx

STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
On behalf of:

   xxxxxx
      Petitioner
v.

   xxxxxx
      Respondent
__________________________

and in the matter of;      Case No; xxxxxx
   
xxxxx
      Petitioner/Father

      and

xxxxx
      Respondent/Mother
____________________________________
      
ORDER ON MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

THIS CAUSE came before the court on November 18, 2003 upon the Respondent/Father's Motion to Consolidate.  The Father being pro se and appearing telephonically, the Mother and her counsel being present and the Department having filed a Notice of No Contest, the court having reviewed its file and hearing arguments of the parties, it is;

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED;

1. The Motion to Consolidate is hereby GRANTED.

2. The child support action in Brevard county shall be consolidated with the family/paternity action in Brevard county

3. The older case shall be the remaining case number, which is case number 05-2003-DR-047595.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Viera, Brevard County, Florida this ___ day of _____________, 2003


1.  Does this look ok?
2.  Should the remaining case style be first, or the case style where the original motion was filed
3.  Am I forgeting anything here?

thanks

socrateaser

>In the matter of;      Case No. xxxxx
>
>STATE OF FLORIDA
>DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
>On behalf of:
>
>   xxxxxx
>      Petitioner
>v.
>
>   xxxxxx
>      Respondent
>__________________________
>
In the matter of;      Case No; xxxxxx
>   
>xxxxx
>      Petitioner/Father
>
>      and
>
>xxxxx
>      Respondent/Mother
>____________________________________
>      
>ORDER ON MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
>
>THIS CAUSE came before the court on November 18, 2003 upon the
>Respondent/Father's Motion to Consolidate.  The Father being
>pro se and appearing telephonically, the Mother and her
>counsel being present and the Department having filed a Notice
>of No Contest, the court having reviewed its file and hearing
>arguments of the parties, it is;
>
>ORDERED AND ADJUDGED;
>
>1. The Motion to Consolidate is hereby GRANTED.
>
>2. The child support action in Brevard county shall be
>consolidated with the family/paternity action in Brevard
>county.
>
>3. The older case shall be the remaining case number, which is
>case number 05-2003-DR-047595.
>
>DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Viera, Brevard County, Florida
>this ___ day of _____________, 2003
>
>
>1.  Does this look ok?

Yep.

>2.  Should the remaining case style be first, or the case
>style where the original motion was filed

The continuning case should lead.

>3.  Am I forgeting anything here?

Yes, send me a check.