Contempt

[Eeyore]

History:  
*X filed show cause why DS should not have overnights & extended V

*Currently has 6 hours EO Sat

*Judge agreed that a parental eval should be done

*Judge stated he would rule according to the eval, so we needed to come to an agreement after eval was done

*Eval was completed, recommended supervised V EO Sat, 4 hrs
*X pulled show cause hearing request. Eval said X has personality disorder and serious psych problems that would be resisitent to treatment, and eval did not know if X could ever parent DS effectively without supervision

*I sent X letter, stating that the V would follow the evaluation until we reached an agreement, gave him ph #s of supervised V centers

*X sent me an e-mail, filled w/ obscenities, threatening to file contempt if I did not show up w/ child, I did not, and to the best of my knowledge he did not.

*Attorney says that if X files contempt, that the eval would serve as a good arguable tool & my letter to X shows that I was trying to work something out w/ him according to the eval

*Just received another e-mail from the X, politely asking me if I was going to show up w/ child, as he did not want to 'waste his time' if I wasn't.

Q:  If you were the X, what would you do?

[Eeyore]

This takes place in Oregon, other folks have been suggesting that I get a temporary emergency order for supervised V, any thots on that?

[socrateaser]

Q: If you were the X, what would you do?

A: Assuming that you are asking me what I would do if I were your opponent. I would find a more well-respected mental health expert than the person who first evaluated me, and then, assuming that the eval was in my favor, I would move for a hearing and present my evidence why the first eval is wrong.

If I couldn't do that, then I would comply with the eval, because I'm gonna lose in court.

But, if X is mentally ill, as you suggest, then he's not gonna listen to anyone except for the voices in his head that are telling him the entire world is wrong and he is right.

[Eeyore]

History:  
*X filed show cause why DS should not have overnights & extended V

*Currently has 6 hours EO Sat

*Judge agreed that a parental eval should be done

*Judge stated he would rule according to the eval, so we needed to come to an agreement after eval was done

*Eval was completed, recommended supervised V EO Sat, 4 hrs
*X pulled show cause hearing request. Eval said X has personality disorder and serious psych problems that would be resisitent to treatment, and eval did not know if X could ever parent DS effectively without supervision

*I sent X letter, stating that the V would follow the evaluation until we reached an agreement, gave him ph #s of supervised V centers

*X sent me an e-mail, filled w/ obscenities, threatening to file contempt if I did not show up w/ child, I did not, and to the best of my knowledge he did not.

*Attorney says that if X files contempt, that the eval would serve as a good arguable tool & my letter to X shows that I was trying to work something out w/ him according to the eval

*Just received another e-mail from the X, politely asking me if I was going to show up w/ child, as he did not want to 'waste his time' if I wasn't.

Q:  If you were the X, what would you do?

[Eeyore]

This takes place in Oregon, other folks have been suggesting that I get a temporary emergency order for supervised V, any thots on that?

[socrateaser]

Q: If you were the X, what would you do?

A: Assuming that you are asking me what I would do if I were your opponent. I would find a more well-respected mental health expert than the person who first evaluated me, and then, assuming that the eval was in my favor, I would move for a hearing and present my evidence why the first eval is wrong.

If I couldn't do that, then I would comply with the eval, because I'm gonna lose in court.

But, if X is mentally ill, as you suggest, then he's not gonna listen to anyone except for the voices in his head that are telling him the entire world is wrong and he is right.