>I am amazed at your ability to sense me out as a vengeful,
>spiteful bitch when you have never met me or understand
>anything about the mediation process we are using to end our
>marriage.
I never said anything of the sort. Please don't put words in my mouth or attribute things to me I never said. I never made any remarks along the lines of "vengeful, spiteful bitch", nor anything even close. It's interesting that you would choose to misinterpret my words that way.
>
>Am I dictating who my STBXH sees? No. He can see anyone he
>chooses, and have whatever relationship with them he would
>like to have.
Except you get to control who is physically allowed in his home when the Sun goes down.
>Am I dictating how he will live? No. He can do what he
>pleases.
Unless he wants to have someone stay the night, then suddenly it's your business.
>Am I asking for a
parenting plan to include a restriction on
>EITHER parent having overnight opposite sex guests present in
>their home while the children are there? Yes. This is in the
>childrens' best interest.
You're like the people who want to pass anti-gambling or anti-whatever bills. They're never the ones who would actually be affected by the bill. You never hear them saying "Pass this law to stop ME from gambling!", it's always "Pass this law to stop THEM from gambling!".
Of course you want a provision like this in the decree because it won't affect you.
>
>Any stipulation such as this made in the parenting plan
>APPLIES TO BOTH PARTIES. Are you aware of this?
See above. You're seeking to control him through the courts. Cut it out. Deal with it, and move on, or spend the next 20 years obsessing over it and letting it drive you crazy.
>I was hoping for a discussion of the issue, not a personal
>attack.
You just don't like what you're hearing, and the fact that I'm not going to sugar-coat it for you.